

Don’t apologize, just explain that peeing yourself is better than hangovers
Marxist-Leninist-Rondeyist-Losurdoist, the only correct combination of names.
Life motto: If Deng didn’t do it, did it even happen?


Don’t apologize, just explain that peeing yourself is better than hangovers


I drink a full glass of water with any alcoholic drink. I pee like a ton, but that’s an excuse to leave convos I don’t wanna be around too or just mingle more around other people instead of being stuck. Also let’s me walk around instead of just sitting the whole time. If people say “you keep leaving to go to the bathroom” I can also be perfectly honest about why and they just say “oh that’s kinda smart”



My fav Pic of a guinea pig


Its amazing that this only shares like 3 sounds with Yuri Gagarin and yet does feel similar. Cadence and syllables or something…


Awesome work comrade, this is some dedication and could legitimately improve so many lives. I’m not transfemme or in need of this (though I am annoyed by how much I have to shave), but I think I could probably make one and bring it around to lend to any friends or comrades who would want!


There has to be a pun to find here about Hair or lack thereof with Yuri Gagarin, Yuri Hair-gone-n?


Just finished chapter 5, and I had forgotten that I’d already read ch5 a while ago. But very powerful, and I think, instead of analyzing it as “being too tired or exhausted to care about coming near antisemitism” (sort of what he says directly) we should analyze it as a sort of argument to prove that antisemitism as Europeans invented it is just not a thing outside of European racist circles. Antisemitism as a material force broader than individuals is not relevant to these discussions. It is superseded, which is obvious in the material reality that are imposed the people of the various groups, highlighted in this book. So the tactic is not useful to keep announcing our anti-antisemitism, we must focus on the current relations and how the European tropes should be ignored as European


The description in chapter 2 of the only acceptable people to be shown to a western audience “if he was a wolf, he must be defanged” felt like a high-brow Citations Needed by a Palestinian expert. Good stuff.
Also appreciate the way he utilizes his definition of humanity/inhuman as well as his desire to become human (feels like Fanon sitting in the background nodding along)


Oh shit I hadn’t seen this group. I’m gonna catch up, I’ve had this book on my ereader for a while but only to like chapter 3


Present an increased risk


Wtf, there’s no way this is a real attempt at understanding lol.
I am going to make a claim that I can’t back up but am 99% sure of anyways. This many arrows can only be distinguished by idealism rampant. Any materialist analysis cannot have this many arrows


I get the feeling this is valuable somehow, based on the effort and the connections, but I think you could make this much more readable by connecting some of the dots in a comment lol. I’ve tried to follow and I’m kind of lost


I am once again asking hexbear to use a more rigorous definition of fascism: https://redsails.org/really-existing-fascism/
What this means for an equivalent in feudalism is interesting, but an odd question once the definition is more rigorous


Roderic Day once again having a perfect piece for the moment: https://redsails.org/on-chomsky/


Caleb was the first I thought of with this too.


For sure , and I just see some options forming (not yet concrete, also I’ll not be the one to figure it out from the other side of the world lol). I think south America could do some radical move to actually separate more from China in exports (keep importing Chinese non-strategic stuff) and convince the USA to invest in them heavily, but doing this while maintaining some sovereignty. Deng was able to do this by using the USSR as the counter weight. I think China will survive such a thing easily (unlike the USSR which was materially weak relatively), and then Brazil, Venezuela, Mexico will be able to build up some needed production means without the US bombing them. Right now, I think we are underestimating how major the lacking production means is playing a role in subservience to the US.
There are tons of problems with this Idea, but I would like to work through more of the contradictions and see what’s possible.


Was trying to have this convo in the news mega. Seems most here are taking the defeatist position on what South America countries can do


Yeah honestly it has changed my analysis to some extent. I think I overestimated the influence of these relationships between wealthy and diplomats/politicians. Turns out, the material force behind both was the strongest once again lol


Tbh I can’t. I have trouble estimating anything above like 10 lol.
‘How many people are in the room with you?’. If it’s above 10, I’m gonna say like ‘uhhhh between 5 and 30’
On the other side: what other option is there than that this is rehearsed and planned ? Is there anyone in the world that thinks that the robots spontaneously did this?