MLRL_Commie [comrade/them, he/him]

Marxist-Leninist-Rondeyist-Losurdoist, the only correct combination of names.

Life motto: If Deng didn’t do it, did it even happen?

  • 2 Posts
  • 556 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 10th, 2024

help-circle


  • This is a misreading and a mischaracterizing analysis. From the beginning, everyone who was upset at Zionist tendencies talked about how the emoji was an EXAMPLE of the ways the Zionist arguments that were behind many choices and treatment of the site.

    There were people saying that it was a “holocaust emoji”, which explicitly accepts the lie that Israel has anything to so with the Holocaust. And I cannot count how many times it was stated in the thread that “the emoji is just an example” and people are still acting like that was it. In general, it’s people making the Zionist argument as described in this article

    I agree that calling someone a Zionist is a strong claim that shouldn’t be used lightly. That’s why I said many times that there were zionist claims being accepted instead. these are comrades who really needed to confront that they were still dealing with brainworms. That is different than being ontologically evil, but deflecting to ‘its just an emoji’ helps nobody.





  • This is all good and nice, but there’s a huge wrinkle: energy. The amount of energy it takes (people, resources, money, time) to really exhaust the bourgeois methods through direct challenge WITHIN the norms is absurdly high. And that energy must be conserved or used in the most productive way possible. The energy required is so high that the #1 excuse for failures is “we needed more energy to win” and that’s an almost inexhaustible resource for the bourgeoisie is a western nation, so it’s always running on a treadmill moving faster than our little legs can manage–racing a giant.

    So the challenge is to find ways to manage an utilize the limited energy we have and prove that the current methods are untenable. Framing it as a problem of not trying hard enough/not exhausting it is exactly how we fail to confront the bourgeois system at its weak point.

    I think George Jackson didn’t mean “exhaust” in reference to how hard we must try, but “exhaust” in terms of how many possibilities we can prove are untenable. Forcing the bourgeois systems themselves to prove that it then the trick.