That Apple can be trusted in ways that other “big tech” companies cannot.
That Apple can be trusted in ways that other “big tech” companies cannot.
If you want specific, I found this: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354856520938602
I think that’s still undecided, as yet
It’s frustrating, considering that ableton’s push runs on Linux, but I never had a satisfactory, or comparable experience running it on a Linux desktop. To be honest, this was the dealbreaker that kept me using a Mac.
What do you think could be negative about it?
You know, I’d rather have him point out genocide as a distraction than ramble on about ‘stopping boats’, ‘unisex bathrooms’, or disability benefits.
I wish I could interpret my legal responsibilities in the same way as these robber barons.
Is there finally about to be a Brexit dividend?
No.
The Sun. Really?
Shame about the headphone jack. Could the switch be repurposed for something a bit more useful, or do you think it’s locked to a single function?
Under neon loneliness, motorcycle emptiness
10% is outrageous, especially considering the price of some trains in Europe.
Sure, that’s something that would need to be tested before it was enforced. But it’s not beyond our capabilities; we’ve made more complex things happen for much more frivolous reasons.
Well, I agree with you about the dynamic governor. And I think that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Not only could it potentially reduce fatal accidents, but it also discourages people from driving in urban areas. The case you mentioned with the highway, well, I think a highway has no business being anywhere near where people have to be. Besides, the I’m sure the tech exists when it comes to guiding missiles or some other military atrocity, why can’t we use tech to actually protect people for a change?
The lack of will is disappointing, but not surprising at all.
Many of the people who go into the military actually believe they are going to do good things for the world but are ignorant of how much evil they will be asked to do most of the time
This level of ignorance is not only dangerous, it’s close to inexcusable in the 21st century.
Ultimately, it’s not the technology that injures people, it’s the person operating it. An increase in numbers cycling means an increase in idiots cycling. I’m not sure there’s much that can be done about this, to be honest. I’m not sure that legislation is the answer. It’s not like traffic laws have eradicated car accidents or dangerous driving. Perhaps we should be at least grateful that idiots only have the power of an e-bike at their disposal and not a car.
As an aside, why is there so much clamour for speed limiters in e-bikes, but not in cars? I can’t think of a good reason why car speeds aren’t mechanically capped.
Probably just vapourware anyway, tbh
nuclear program in a State that exports hate and has expansionist tendencies
authoritarian misogynist culture that covers and harms women
backwards disordered men living in fantasies killing in the name of an entity they have never had a conversation with
Do you not see the irony in your words, here?
At least the band keeps playing as the ship sinks.