• doleo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I am once again asking the question: Why don’t cars have built-in speed regulators?

    There’s constant chatter about the potential risks associated with the rise in e-bikes, but little to no mention of regulating the existing menace. You want to talk about excessive power? Look no further.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Governors presumably set to the speed limit?

      There are places in the US with posted 85mph speed limits on the freeways.

      Is that where we are setting them?

    • Alerian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not that I don’t agree with you, but to be fair, cars do require a license, they have to be registered and reguraly checked, which is not the case for a bike. In my opinion the failure here is that those should not be allowed for sale as bikes. Those are motocycle in all but name.

      • Bob@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        In Norway e-bikes are extremely strictly regulated: They need to have a power output of 250 W or less, motor output has to be linked to your pedaling movements, and the motor has to shut off completely when you reach 25 km/h. Anything more than that and you need to register it as a scooter/motorcycle. At which point you need a drivers licence, insurance, and can no longer ride it on bike paths. I was under the impression that this was an EU requirement. But maybe S-Pedelecs are treated like normal bicycles in the rest of Europe?

        • Alerian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          It’s the same in the EU but as with cars, the power can be electronically limited, so the user can remove the limitation with some limited tinkering. So you end up with and electric motorbike, and there is no regular check or registration. I have also never Heard of any form of control about this. Still better than letting people buy cars that can go 250kmh and trusting them with it, but at least you can track car owners.

        • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          But maybe S-Pedelecs are treated like normal bicycles in the rest of Europe?

          No, it’s exactly like you’ve described the situation in Norway.

    • brot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s even harder with cars: Why are cars even allowed to go 240km/h? Yeah, there is the german autobahn, but there’s no reason why a car which is registered in France should be able to go faster than the french max motorway speed limit. There is also no reason to allow cars to be able to go from 0 to 100 in x seconds. There is no use case for that, even if you try to merge into a motorway or overtake somewhere.

      • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        The drive from France to the nearest German motorway without a speed limit isn’t that far, though.

        You can also do track days and such, but I agree with you they don’t need to be that quick

      • RepleteLocum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Actually, the speed should be a bit over the speed limit. What if you are driving the speed limit, but suddenly someone almost hits you? You gotta drive a bit faster.

      • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Electronic limits are a bunch of bullshit, because they can be easily turned off.

        Constructively limited top speeds would make a whole lot more sense.

    • witty_username@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Totally agree with you. Would like to add that we should also limit the noise that cars and motorcycles make. Many places have noise regulations but they are rarely enforced

    • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      This one seems fairly obvious to me. People regard their cars as they would their homes and computers: personal space. They don’t like their personal space being regulated, even if they don’t intend to break the law. An analogy might be monitoring one’s internet traffic. Sure, I don’t intend to break any laws, but I still don’t like it. Any politician wading into this fight is going to get their asses handed to them in the next election.

      • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Going in a car, you necessarily interact with others, what you do and how you do it clearly affects their safety, their personal space and you can even easily kill them with a single wrong movement of one hand or one foot.

        That’s by definition clearly the realm where your personal freedom ends - the fundamental rights of others give it limits. And this is good so.

        • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Going on a computer with internet access gives one the ability to exact enormous damage on the world at exponentially higher scale than anything one could do in a car. Should all computer use be actively monitored?

      • doleo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thank you for sharing, that was an interesting read. I hadn’t heard of this before.

        The first two feedback options do not directly intervene but only provide warnings (first optic and if no response from the driver, a delayed acoustic/vibrating warning), which have to be as short as possible in duration to avoid potential annoyance of the driver.

        This part was particularly amusing.