A friend of a friend played as a scruffy ranger. Bounty Hunter background. Had a big dog companion. Wasn’t until they clarified that the dog was a great dane named Scooby that the others figured it out.

Heard of another case of a gnomish monk, way of the drunken master. Apparently chosen entirely so they could say “I’m a little drunk”.

No

“Here at Spite-Full Pies, we understand exactly how you feel about those family get-togethers. Go ahead and take home this pie, and if your uncle Dave continues texting bigoted remarks in the family chat, maybe you just “forget” to bring it and eat the whole thing when you come back?”

kid-safe

Oh, I’m sure that will remain true for at least three minutes after people start using them.

Does this guy not understand that 99% of calls from unknown numbers are spam? If he picks the person who always answers, he’s gonna be disappointed when they’re spending more time answering spam calls than doing intern work.

I will do nothing in my power to stop you

Hot damn, you actually found it

I’ve wondered for years when we’d reach this point. Optics-based processors have the potential to blow way past the limitations of electrical/copper circuits, at least in theory. I’m curious to see where this leads.

If you happen to be using an ethernet cable, a PoE hat can work great as well. Just be sure to check the voltages and wattage compatibility, as there are multiple specs for PoE.

This looks relevant and also way over my head at the moment. Looks like I have some reading to do.

Correction, turns out doing it entirely in Excel was the answer for me. The points I found were correct, but the area calculation in my code was wrong.

I had to visualize it before I could even attempt to solve it. Still did it mostly intuitively based on the visualization.

Apparently this is wrong. Not sure what I’m missing here. correct, my code was borked I guess (maybe an overflow or something?).

Thanks for your thoughts! For the input data, I did notice that every substitution goes from 1 element to 2-8 elements. I suppose I could take that into account, and order them from “most efficient” to “least efficient”, and that way I might be able to stop iterating earlier?

I also haven’t looked into whether there are any combinations that are impossible to build from (or inversely to break down into e).

Those two are probably good avenues to try.

Thanks again!

Did you also try to implement a sort that ended up being magnitudes less efficient than calling .sort(), or are you normal?

I’m gonna say >!Ba1, then take whichever piece black moves for mate!<

Yep, another example of boots theory

Politics

I’ve responded with “check page 3 of the docs” before.

Assume spherical child