Reminds me of something Alok said about playbooks: we focus on the books but forget to play.

I don’t think they want that smoke, better to let your competitor hurt themselves

At least that hole wouldn’t spew lies

Milo got in trouble for criticising Isreal. Maybe if he sucked off Trump like Loomer did he might still be on this side of the pond.

Cthulu is an archetype, right? Comes into our world with no regard other than what it can manipulate and drives people insane.

Edit: thinking about it, it’s not an archetype when it comes from an LLM. The consistency it does display doesn’t come from some conviction an entity should be a certain way. Ask an LLM to put an archetype in a novel situation and it falls back to matching forms.

This isn’t about "disagreeing with people " so much as tolerating intolerance .

I appreciate the emphasis on conviviality or human centric design. But boy I want to nitpick on the following:

when we collaborate with AI systems, we might be interfacing with the archetypal patterns that have guided human wisdom throughout history. This makes programming with AI a form of accessing collective spiritual wisdom rather than just advanced tooling.

I agree with the first half, that yes, you are engaging with archetypal patterns that is often present in human wisdom but that is where it stops. There is no guarantee the LLM has selected the appropriate pattern for your use case. There is no wisdom from the LLM because there is no conviction from its choices. The LLM, at best, is a superstitious machine that sees that X pattern worked in a situation with similar signifiers. Wisdom is understanding which signifiers are of consequence given your context, which requires being able to ignore/forget irrelevant context - something an LLM is terrible at doing as evident by all the “context engineering” tools that exist. It feels like a chicken and egg problem where in order for the LLM to “get right” what is the appropriate context it must first have the appropriate context.

It would be Useful for doing a retrospective on whether AI is helpful or not

I find it funny the Americans still think they are on top because of their relative “quality of living” to an impoverished state. May the century of humiliation commence!

“Oil is flowing” they say while our emergency oil reserves are at an all time low. “They will have a missile logistics problem” they say while our own missiles are practically depleted. “It’s about endurance” as our sailors try to kill themselves. It’s existential for Iran, they are not going to surrender.

Before Sting there was Police. So it’s Police Mary

When you mistake an onion article (satire) for something real we say the person ate the onion.

The Quebec bit has me tasting onions.

For all the people comparing ICE to nazis, ask yourself if the Nazis ever used shock gloves. Check mate liberals.

Wdym, he duties all the time in the oval office. You can practically smell it.

Meat and media are our version of bread and circus. The ranchers gotta understand we can’t have the plebes clamoring for revolution

When Rome fell most people didn’t notice it except that the aquaducts never got repaired.

I thought AI was supposed to give us an infinite number of Einsteins and Mozarts. They can’t even keep their own lore/propaganda straight

Where did musk get those extra slices? only 2 are missing from his pie…

Heard a rumor that one of his advisor is married to an AI specialist at Google. Like I don’t expect Sanders to know who yud is unless someone on his staff told him it would be a good idea to talk to him.