• Flying SquidOP
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    We would have plenty of money to spend at home and abroad if we didn’t have a military bigger than the next 20 combined. Giving foreign aid is something all first world countries do. Because they have it better than others. Even if there are people who live in poverty in America, overall the standard of living is higher than Afghanistan.

    • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Maybe, if we hadn’t bombed their country for 20 years they’d have a higher standard of living. We’ll never know though

      • Flying SquidOP
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Considering how they were before we bombed them, that’s doubtful.

        • Maybe it Britain hadn’t fucked up the entire region when the sun didn’t set on their empire, Afghanistan would have a higher standard of living. We’ll still never know.

        • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          You think aid is going to stop the Taliban. We’re aiding a country we bombed, because of terrorists we created, because the Soviet Union was spreading communism. We’re deriving solutions to problems we created.

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            You think aid is going to stop the Taliban

            I do? Weird, I thought what I thought was that it was going to help Afghan women and nothing else due to restrictions put on the funding. That’s what the article said. You read it, right?

            • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Unfortunately I can’t read well do to astigmatism, so I had my daughter read it to me. It said “a specter is haunting America - the specter of enlightened centrism.” What does that mean?

          • @minnow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Are you suggesting that we shouldn’t try to solve problems that we created? That if we create a problem, intentionally or not, that we should just say to the world “ok you deal with it now”?

            Because that sure seems like what you’re saying here.

            • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              That is exactly what I am saying. Did the Taliban ask for our help? Would our government accept aid from China to curb homelessness here? With restrictions of course that it be used only for food and clothing. They are a sovereign nation. We are usurping their authority. And we wonder why they hate us.

              • @minnow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                Well that’s one of the more fucked up and asinine things I’ve heard in a while.

                You know countries can refuse aide, right? Nobody is forcing them to accept the money. Because, you know, they’re a sovereign nation with the authority to make decisions for themselves. You even said it yourself

                Would our government accept aid from China

                China offering us aid doesn’t “usurpe our authority”. How the heck did you even come up with that nonsense.

                But hey, believe whatever you want. Me, I think we should take responsibility for the harm we’ve done to the world and offer to make amends in some way or another. I don’t think it’s right to take a shit in somebody else’s yard and tell them it’s their problem. But again, that’s me.

    • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      That money we give comes with strings that benefit us. We don’t give money unless we get something in return. Quid pro quo. Reciprocity.