• @sunbeam60
    link
    21 month ago

    WTAF are you talking about. On Lemmy, you’re either a communist or a billlionaire tooting nazi.

    I’m in favour of a progressive tax on income, in favour of inheritance tax and in favour of a wealth tax. That doesn’t mean I think some people shouldn’t become rich from their efforts or that every wealthy person has gotten their by exploring the labour they employ (everybody else free to take that risk too).

    I’d like my government and country run like the Nordics. Where I do fit in in your insane binary world?

    • @Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I am from the Nordics. Spoiler: the rich get rich from exploiting workers and national resources, or inheritance from someone else that did.

      Look at university professors’ pay compared to that of a broker if you think we have a merit awarding income system.

      • @sunbeam60
        link
        11 month ago

        Me too. If you think the Nordics is bad, don’t move move to the U.K. or US where I am. We can argue all day long about our experience of each system, but look at the Gini coefficient alone for some data.

        • @Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Yeah, I am proud of my country’s history of somewhat national control over resources and not super incredibly terrible distribution of wealth. The bar set by the UK and US is outstandingly low though, and the trend for the Nordics is going in the wrong direction, and has been for 50 years, even though there were lots of potential for improvement even 50 years ago.

          The communist viewpoint is that bourgeoisie interests will inevitably erode social democracies and make them rot from within. You have to replace the capitalist mode of production to have a chance at combatting exploitation of nature and people in any real and lasting capacity.