• @dudebro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    I’m not sure what the future may bring.

    I predict a lot of uninhabitable zones will become habitable while habitable zones will become uninhabitable.

    Perhaps the biggest barrier to survival will be the ability to migrate to these new habitable zones.

    • @FireMyth
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      What uninhabitable zones are you looking at?

        • @FireMyth
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          I suppose that’s true- had kinda forgotten those regions existed honestly.

        • jadero
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Tundras aren’t going to be all that liveable just because the temperature is a bit nicer. They’ll still get very dark in the winter. Like 24-hour darkness, in some of it. Some people thrive, some people cope, some people go batshit crazy when daylight hours drop below about 4 hours a day.

          That’s actually the easy part. Most tundra is sitting on top of permafrost. I worked on low latitude tundra for one summer and if my experience there is representative, melting permafrost is going to turn a lot of tundra into swampland for a long time.

          Even if I’m wrong about the tundra turning into swampland, there isn’t really all that much room. Good luck cramming a few billion people above 55 or 60 degrees latitude.

          • @jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The tree line is moving pole-wards thanks to global warming; the gain is less than what’s lost by the desert line moving pole-wards, but it’s something.

            Good luck cramming a few billion people above 55 or 60 degrees latitude

            Realistically, you need less than 1m² of terrain per person if you stack them in high enough buildings. Look at how China is doing it.

            • jadero
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I’m glad I’m old enough to not have to consider living at the population density you suggest. I find the population density of Saskatchewan to be quite enough. I lived in a small city (Saskatoon) for 40 years and the last 10 were flat out miserable. The first 30 were tolerable only because we escaped to nature every weekend.

      • @AquaTofana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I’d imagine places like Svalbard. Technically it’s inhabitable now, and has been for decades but it’s the most Northern year round sustained population on the globe.

        Further North is Arctic tundra and there isn’t a sustained population. Maybe he’s referring to areas like that.

        Though I will say that back in 2019 I saw an article about how every winter a bunch of Reindeer in Svalbard die due to climate change. As the spring rolls in and snow melts, Reindeer corpses are left behind in the fields 🥺.