• @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 months ago

    No it just wouldn’t.

    Like, are you imagining a modern US warship doesn’t have internet 24/7?

    This was for porn and maybe streaming services and social media, but mostly porn.

    It wasn’t for any official use, because they have that covered.

    You’re acting like surface ships are submarines…

    • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 months ago

      Like, are you imagining a modern US warship doesn’t have internet 24/7?

      last I checked, no, they don’t. they had shitty service while in port, and not much else.

      https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2023/12/29/new-in-2024-better-wi-fi-for-sailors/

      fuck mate they only recently started giving their people access ON SHORE.

      https://www.stripes.com/branches/navy/2024-01-25/navy-free-wi-fi-pilot-program-12796438.html

      so no, I don’t think for the average sailor a US warship provides internet access 24/7

      • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        That article is about wifi for personal use…

        And the second one is about it being free and you’re acting like they didn’t have Internet before then?

        so no, I don’t think for the average sailor a US warship provides internet access 24/7

        Yeah man, you have zero idea what people are talking about about.

        • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          102 months ago

          That article is about wifi for personal use…

          do you think the starlink terminal in the OP article was for military use?? bwahahaha

          Yeah man, you have zero idea what people are talking about about.

          ok buddy, have a nice life.

          • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            I said:

            This was for porn and maybe streaming services and social media, but mostly porn.

            And on your second reply you said:

            do you think the starlink terminal in the OP article was for military use?? bwahahaha

            I stand by my original assessment after your first comment:

            Yeah man, you have zero idea what people are talking about

            Because you literally don’t understand the conversation

                • @Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  42 months ago

                  Such a strange person, I’m not sure what point they’re arguing, but they’re definitely determined to argue it.

            • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              spin it however you like, this statement:

              Like, are you imagining a modern US warship doesn’t have internet 24/7?

              is not correct. gonna block you now, you’re a waste of time.

              • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 months ago

                Yes…

                The ship has Internet…

                For official business.

                That’s not the same as everyone having wifi for anything.

                For fucks sake, how can you not understand this? It’s really not that difficult…

    • vortic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 months ago

      Whether they have wifi on ship or not isn’t the issue. Sometimes, when a ship goes into an operation, they will turn off all signals except passive or directed signals so that they can’t easily be detected. Having a communications signal that isn’t under the control of the ship’s officers is a huge security risk during operations.

      Someone is going to be court martialed over this.