We used to have earbuds that don’t need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn’t get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

    • @jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      902 months ago

      Yeah, you’d snag the wire or slightly bend the connector and then you were just playing a game of making sure it stayed plugged into the exact right angle.

      • @silasmariner@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        272 months ago

        Had to make sure there has just the right tension on the left wire or you’d only get half the track. Bonus points for weirdly mixed stereo where that just sounded shit

      • Fonzie!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Or replace it, those things were like 50 cents and all sorts of devices had earbuds delivered with them, included in the price.

    • @goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      432 months ago

      and then you’d just replace them with one of the other three dozen you bought from Wal-Mart for five bucks back in 2016

        • @goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          362 months ago

          hey I’ll have you know I keep all my broken earbuds in the same box in the garage with all the other cables and assorted dongles I can no longer identify and will likely never use, like any responsible citizen should

        • Lemminary
          link
          fedilink
          English
          212 months ago

          I don’t think earbuds make up a significant percentage of the patch to be here virtue signaling and shaming people for what they were encouraged to do by corporate greed. Your source says the great majority of the patch comes from agriculture and fishing.

          • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            172 months ago

            I don’t think earbuds make up a significant percentage of the patch

            Cheap and disposable plastics and electronics IS a significant part of the world garbage problem and yes, plastic particles is MOST of the garbage patch specifically.

            be here virtue signaling and shaming people for what they were encouraged to do by corporate greed

            Whoa, dude, hold your horses! I’m in no way blaming consumers. Making consumer electronics cheap crap that breaks easily and everything of decent quality prohibitively expensive is 100% on the greedy corporations, not their victims the consumers.

            Your source says the great majority of the patch comes from agriculture and fishing.

            Ok, admittedly a poor choice of example. Doesn’t invalidate my intended point though, however ill-stated heh

            • @Tankton@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              When people talk about disposable plastic they don’t mean electronics like earbuds. They mean packaging, plastic bottles, plastic bags etc.

            • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              This is tough -

              Making consumer electronics cheap crap that breaks easily and everything of decent quality prohibitively expensive is 100% on the greedy corporations, not their victims the consumers.

              (US here) Gets me thinking about dollar store headphones. Consumers could buy decent headphones for about $10 direct from overseas. When that’s equivalent to more than an hour of wages, there’s still demand for the $1 version. Should this need not be met out of a sense of social responsibility?

              (I don’t have a perfect answer myself)

              Econ 101 on my mind here btw:

              • @Serinus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 months ago

                The problem is that our economic system has encouraged an environment where reputation is a thing to be immediately cashed out. You can’t even know if those $10 earbuds are any better than the $1 version.

                • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  32 months ago

                  You can make some reasonable assumptions although they will be imperfect:

                  Wouldn’t be as frequently imperfect if freaking review fraud weren’t entirely ubiquitous (grrrr)

        • @tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          202 months ago

          If you think Bluetooth earphones won’t also be in that pile once the batteries stop holding charge after 2 years, you’re in for a world of dissapointing sex

          • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            My AirBudz are over five years old and still play for like five hours before I need to charge them… and I used them 40+ hours daily for all of those years.

          • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            My point wasn’t wired vs wireless. It was disposable crap that breaks vs corporations not deliberately making crap the only thing most people can comfortably afford.

        • @marduk@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’m here for the wired headphone -> pacific garbage patch vs lithium battery child labor -> wireless headphone fight 🍿

            • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 months ago

              You might want to edit the comment since in the context it definitely sounds like saying wireless would be better

              • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 months ago

                Not really, no. I’m responding to a comment about cheap buds that break too easily, which isn’t exclusive to wired ones.

                There’s literally no mention of the wired vs wireless aspect in my comment or the one I’m replying to.

                • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  42 months ago

                  My friend, the whole thread is about wireless vs. wired. That’s the context your post is in. And you’ve already had several people misunderstanding your intention because it is written in that context without clarification that it’s not supposed to be the same as other comments here.

                  • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    12 months ago

                    My friend, the whole thread is about wireless vs. wired

                    Not my comment. I’m clearly commenting on a separate aspect. That others try to ascribe a nonexistent secondary meaning that I haven’t so much as hinted at isn’t my fault.

                    without clarification that it’s not supposed to be the same as other comments here.

                    I’m personally not a big fan of spelling out the obvious, but ok:

                    You’re wrong to assume that my comment follows the previous theme from pure proximity and it’s annoying to have to bend over backwards to facilitate the poor reading comprehension (if not bad faith) of people making up their minds about what I’m saying before reading it.

            • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              I’d imagine the limited lifespan of their batteries and the fact that they have ones to begin with would be of bigger concern

              • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                That’s fair. My first pair still works awesome after five years, and I’ve used them for 40+ hours a week for that whole time. I only have a new pair because I needed ANC, but I still use my old pair to sleep.

                • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 months ago

                  I think the headphones I’m using are 20 year old. But to be fair, a lot of them either don’t last that long or are simply thrown away for some new thing.

    • @Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      The TWS equivalent to that is one of the buds no longer turning on. I just had to RMA a pair because of that.