@cplusplus@programming.dev to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish • 15 hours agoWhy Veracrypt not flatpak?message-square8fedilinkarrow-up15
arrow-up15message-squareWhy Veracrypt not flatpak?@cplusplus@programming.dev to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish • 15 hours agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-square@ReversalHatchery@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglish1•4 hours agoand then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? that it can be used with older dependencies? if so, is that a good thing to have for things that modify system startup?
minus-square@JustMarkov@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish2•3 hours ago and then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? Flatpaks is a universal package format, it works almost everywhere. Also, there are immutable distros, that use flatpak as the default package format.
and then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? that it can be used with older dependencies? if so, is that a good thing to have for things that modify system startup?
Flatpaks is a universal package format, it works almost everywhere. Also, there are immutable distros, that use flatpak as the default package format.