Now if only they could more clearly communicate when games are playable offline.

  • @sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    However, it’s only being forced for kernel-level anti-cheat. If it’s only client-side or server-side, it’s optional, but Valve say “we generally think that any game that makes use of anti-cheat technology would benefit from letting players know”.

    I will always love Valve for their ability to use corpospeak against corpos.

    Your game has anti-cheat?

    Wonderful!

    I’m sure that always only results in an improved experience for all gamers, lets let them all know!

    =D

    • @Joeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      How does vac play into all of this then …

      Edit: I was talking about them labeling vac games as being anti cheat… And wondering if they were going to pull some double standard… I didn’t know they label them already and still don’t know if they do…

      • @sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        VAC is not kernel level, because surprise you don’t actually need kernel level to do anti cheat well.

        VAC games would just get the standard AC message banner, not the scary yellow kernel level warning banner.

        … I am pretty sure VAC games have indicated on their store page that they use VAC for well over a decade.

        • lastweakness
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 hours ago

          you don’t actually need kernel level to do anti cheat well.

          I’m sure you’re right, but VAC is one of the worst examples for that… I think whatever Blizzard does with Overwatch 2 is a better example.

      • graff
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1311 hours ago

        It doesn’t run at the kernel level?