How many millions of users does it have? How many posts? How active are they?

  • BaroqueInMind
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just say 40,000. Which is a pathetic number, but perfectly fine for the type of niche communities budding up here and there across all the domains connected together here.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      3 days ago

      40k users is huge. Remember, lemmy is not profit driven. We don’t need to grow at all costs, we can grow naturally and sustainably.

      • DeeDan06@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        40000 is enough to be a functioning social media. most fediverse softwares don’t have that much. Sure, it is not enough to have discussions over non mainstream stuff, but there are still enough people for a variety of topics.

      • mesamune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        …I kinda like it right now. Some communities of less than a 1000 have much more human responses. It nice. And not just from one server.

        • sith@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          There are huge subreddits that are basically dead or just filled with spam. The ratio of active/passive users on Lemmy must be much much larger. A Lemmy community with 100 active members almost feels like a subreddit with 10 000 members.

          • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 days ago

            A Lemmy community with 100 active members is more likely to be 100 active humans than a subreddit with 10,000 members is, based on the last time I went to Reddit: it was so, so clear that everything was either ChatGPT, or a repost of shit even I had already seen, or was just otherwise obviously not an authentic human sharing something interesting.

            So yeah, not entirely surprising.

            • mesamune@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              It might also be that we were some of the prolific posters on reddit. I heard somewhere that the top couple percent of posters on reddit used to make a majority of the new posts. And the rest lurk

              • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                That’s probably true, though I’m not sure who has ever actually made a legitimate determination since you’d have to remove the non-humans from the numbers first and, well, Reddit isn’t going to tank their MAU numbers by ever releasing that kind of stat.

                It’s also not helped once you hit a certain size and the nature of scale takes over and the level of toxicity goes up: even in small groups, when a new person shows up and asks the same question for the 20th time, they start taking shit for it. If you’re in a BIG group, it turns into a giant dogpile, and people stop asking questions because who the hell likes that kind of response, so you end up with a lot of people who are subscribed to something, but none of whom actually contribute at all.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      I would have, but they asked in millions and I was being cheeky.

      I don’t find it pathetic, I’m quite happy with it. Sure, I’d be happy to get more but in no rush.