Sanctions were applied after the social media platform delayed compliance with a federal search warrant that required Twitter to hand over Donald Trump’s Twitter data without telling the former president about the warrant for 180 days.

  • @WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    I feel like it should be noted that Twitter didn’t have any objections at all to handing over all of Trump’s data. Thier only issue was with not telling him about it.

    • @legion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      421 year ago

      Thier only issue was with not telling him about it.

      That was a legal tactic. It doesn’t mean that was their actual concern. It means it was the best counterargument they could come up with.

    • hoodatninja
      link
      fedilink
      28
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you read the article that was one of several things they threw out there to excuse their consistently delaying/not complying. The courts told them repeatedly that their opinions on the matter were wrong and they kept delaying over and over again.

      I mean come on:

      “Twitter contends that it ‘substantially complied with the [w]arrant’ because ‘there was nothing [it] could have done to comply faster’ after the court issued the February 7 order,” the court document said.
      The court rejected Twitter’s “good faith” arguments, mainly because the company blew past the original deadline and repeatedly failed to raise concerns at earlier opportunities.

      Twitter continued challenging the nondisclosure order and the sanctions, but the court rejected most of its arguments and ultimately affirmed the contempt sanctions, issuing its opinion on July 18.

      This nonsense went on for months.

      • Granite
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        To avoid a fine, all they had to do was tell the court they needed more time before the deadline*

        *Because Space Karen fired all the people who knew how to look this up