A fringe website featured the purported names and addresses of the Fulton County grand jury that indicted Trump and 18 other people for their efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

  • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The identity of the jurors are public record in Georgia, so I doubt this will unless they can prove a conspiracy to harass or some such

    • theDoctor@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you read the article? Pretty clear it’s more than even harassment…

      “These jurors have signed their death warrant by falsely indicting President Trump," a post on a pro-Trump forum read in response to a post including the names of jurors, which was viewed by NBC News.

      Also, Grand Juries are secret, regular juries are not. That’s why these articles are all referring to them as the ‘purported’ jurors.

      If they did somehow actually get the jury members names and release them, that alone could (and should) be seen as a threat considering the secret nature.

      • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        In Georgia, grand jury identities are public, not secret. It’s how things are done there.

        If harassment happens, actually happens, and they tie it to the doxxing and can prove intent or a conspiracy, then maybe we will see a prosecution.

        • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          But if strange men in white robes hang the jurors from trees that will just be a tragic but unrelated coincidence?

            • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Spoken like a gangster, thug, and/or lawyer.

              Is it a threat or an appeal to the rule of law?

              I can no longer discern.

              • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s a description of reality, not a moral statement. I don’t know why you’re offended

                • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I was not offended.

                  I was describing the reality of how those words hit today.

                  Florida has redefined boundaries by pulling out the Nazi playbook.

                  • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    And I was just describing what goes into the decision to prosecute or not. That was pretty damn clear, so I’m not sure why you’re trying to talk to me about Nazis or whatever.