@sv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agoYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square1099fedilinkarrow-up12.28K
arrow-up12.28Kexternal-linkYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.com@sv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square1099fedilink
minus-square@pedroapero@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish7•10 months agoExcept that powering the world with nuclear would require thousands of reactors and so much more disasters. This doesn’t even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials.
minus-square@uis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•10 months ago This doesn’t even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials. You mean under ground from where it was dug out?
minus-square@pedroapero@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish2•10 months agoThe plant itself, water inevitably getting in contact with wastes and leaking also.
minus-square@uis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoYou mean water under ground? It was in contact million years before any of us was born.
minus-square@pedroapero@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoMillion years were sufficient for the radioactivity to decay before life started to evolve on earth.
minus-square@intensely_human@lemm.eecakelinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoThen how does it fuel nuclear reactors?
Except that powering the world with nuclear would require thousands of reactors and so much more disasters. This doesn’t even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials.
You mean under ground from where it was dug out?
The plant itself, water inevitably getting in contact with wastes and leaking also.
You mean water under ground? It was in contact million years before any of us was born.
Million years were sufficient for the radioactivity to decay before life started to evolve on earth.
Then how does it fuel nuclear reactors?