• funkyb
    link
    fedilink
    1910 months ago

    that’s both unreasonable and not the right way to approach this. Your assumption is that if you knew the names of all possible processes that you could then be in a position to make better decisions. the problem is names are useless - it’s trivial for software to run under different names, so believing names can help you somehow is a waste of time.

    • Melody Fwygon
      link
      English
      22
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This is blatantly false. Name and fucking shame each variety of software. These cockroaches can’t stand the light of public attention. The more people who know how to spot and identify malicious and suspicious boss-ware behavior, the better. It protects the user to know that the software exists; as they can better be prepared to combat and deter abuses of this software by unprofessional and shitty bosses.

      No; it isn’t going to be foolproof. That’s not the intent here. The intent is for everyone to be able to name, shame, and identify when software that their employer is deploying is going to be behaving in a manner that blatantly violates their rights to privacy in a non-constructive way that threatens them.

      • @DogMom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        This can go way beyond ‘tracking’ software. I used to write software that my company used in its core business activities. Almost everyone in the company used some portion of this software. The logging for that system included timestamps and user IDs the captured general high level activities. If we had a system issue we could ramp up the logging to much more granular levels. If mgmt asked we could query the logs and get a pretty good idea of how much or little you were using the system. That wasn’t the main intent for the logging but it had been used for employee performance monitoring on more than one occasion… In all my years of coding, every app I worked on had similar logging.

        If you are on a work PC, assume your activity can be monitored and/or logged in some fashion.

      • @jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        910 months ago

        Just assume anything that work controls is monitored by your work. And act accordingly.

        Don’t install work software on personal devices. And you’ll be fine

      • FarraigePlaisteach
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        I had a weekend hard disk that I swapped with the work one. No idea if it kept me safe or not, but the OS wasn’t even the same.