• @papertowels
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      It’s so refreshing not waking up to new presidential news every day. What the president does has very little effect on your day to day life, politics shouldn’t be mixed up with entertainment.

      I’d happily take a boring president over the last administration… a day that the POTUS isn’t reduced to a dried bean salesman is a good day in my book.

      • btbt [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Why are all of these proles complaining about getting crushed by the prole crushing machine? Don’t they realize I’m trying to eat brunch? Why can’t they just be happy with getting slaughtered by the status quo so that people like me don’t have to think about anything unpleasant?”

        • @papertowels
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Cute. Presidents making the news every day doesn’t mean they’re helping the common folk, but keep making your assumptions.

          • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            171 year ago

            Clearly. We all know that. But, conversely, if a president did start helping the proles, they would be in the news constantly. Probably heavily maligned too.

            • @papertowels
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              You’re right, but I’m not going to hold my breath waiting for that to happen…

              • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                91 year ago

                Me either. Glad we got that out of the way. Now let me copy someone else’s comment from earlier in the thread, because I think it’s the point we’re all trying to make that you seem extremely unwilling to understand:

                If the policy outcomes are the same either way, I don’t see why libs are so worked up over whether or not a president is boring.

                • @papertowels
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  That’s because I should’ve been more specific - on a spectrum of harmful-> neutral-> beneficial, I’d take neutral over harmful.

                  The president shouldn’t be in the news for advertising Goya beans in the oval office. He shouldn’t be conducting diplomacy in 180 characters or less on Twitter. Much of the appeal for the last administration was that he was considered “accessible” due to constantly being in the news, to no real benefit to the American people besides entertainment/feeding the media cycle. It was exhausting to wake up and hear the next mockery of the country on a daily basis.

                  Biden fucked up the railway unionizing, it’s true, but I’d take not hearing about fuckups on the daily over the opposite.

                  • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    101 year ago

                    Yeah, good, ok. You have enough wealth and privilege that you can ignore politics and go back to brunch now that Biden is in office. Neat. Good for you.

                  • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    101 year ago

                    The people crushing machine is still running at full bore, Biden is not neutral. You are not neutral. You support the system of the most incredible violence ever created