@Hexorg@beehaw.orgM to Programming@beehaw.orgEnglish • 1 year agoArticle: We need more of Richard Stallman, not lessploum.netexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up142file-textcross-posted to: classicblogposts@lemm.eeclassicblogposts@lemmy.fmhy.mlstallmanwasright@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mlfreesoftware@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.mlopensource@lemmy.mltechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up142external-linkArticle: We need more of Richard Stallman, not lessploum.net@Hexorg@beehaw.orgM to Programming@beehaw.orgEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square22fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: classicblogposts@lemm.eeclassicblogposts@lemmy.fmhy.mlstallmanwasright@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mlfreesoftware@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.mlopensource@lemmy.mltechnews@radiation.party
minus-square@sorebuttfromsitting@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoit isn’t weird to fight for good, public code.
minus-square@Hexorg@beehaw.orgOPMlinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoIt’s not, I agree, but I think if GPL proponents find revenue streams they can use open code will get much better adaptation
it isn’t weird to fight for good, public code.
It’s not, I agree, but I think if GPL proponents find revenue streams they can use open code will get much better adaptation