@Hexorg@beehaw.orgM to Programming@beehaw.orgEnglish • 1 year agoArticle: We need more of Richard Stallman, not lessploum.netexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up142file-textcross-posted to: classicblogposts@lemm.eeclassicblogposts@lemmy.fmhy.mlstallmanwasright@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mlfreesoftware@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.mlopensource@lemmy.mltechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up142external-linkArticle: We need more of Richard Stallman, not lessploum.net@Hexorg@beehaw.orgM to Programming@beehaw.orgEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square22fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: classicblogposts@lemm.eeclassicblogposts@lemmy.fmhy.mlstallmanwasright@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mlfreesoftware@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.mlopensource@lemmy.mltechnews@radiation.party
minus-square@beefcat@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglish25•1 year agoWe need more of Stallman’s idealism, but we need less of the black-and-white firey rhetoric that often comes with. It becomes a lot harder to see other points of view and come to a common understanding when we are constantly at eachother’s throats.
We need more of Stallman’s idealism, but we need less of the black-and-white firey rhetoric that often comes with. It becomes a lot harder to see other points of view and come to a common understanding when we are constantly at eachother’s throats.