Joe Biden worries that the “extreme” US supreme court, dominated by rightwing justices, cannot be relied upon to uphold the rule of law.

“I worry,” the president told ProPublica in interview published on Sunday. “Because I know that if the other team, the Maga Republicans, win, they don’t want to uphold the rule of law.”

“Maga” is shorthand for “Make America great again”, Donald Trump’s campaign slogan. Trump faces 91 criminal charges and assorted civil threats but nonetheless dominates Republican polling for the nomination to face Biden in a presidential rematch next year.

In four years in the White House, Trump nominated and saw installed three conservative justices, tilting the court 6-3 to the right. That court has delivered significant victories for conservatives, including the removal of the right to abortion and major rulings on gun control, affirmative action and other issues.

The new court term, which starts on Tuesday, could see further such rulings on matters including government environmental and financial regulation.

    • @hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      No way.

      That’s just creating a judicial version of the Senate.

      I don’t want a drastic overall of the SC, I just want to see more accountability.

      • Cranakis
        link
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t want a drastic overall of the SC, I just want to see more accountability.

        Ok, agreed but can we do term limits next? This giving it to the whoever is the president when someone drops is bullshit. Especially now that the bar has been lowered so far for the office.

    • @elscallr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The States already have their own courts. We don’t need a federal government at all, really, except a few very limited purposes. The purposes are even already spelled out for us in the US Constitution.

      • Exatron
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        Hahahahah.

        Oh, wait, you’re serious. Let me laugh even harder.

        HAHAHAHAH!

      • @hurricane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Obviously states and ctitizens in general can not agree on the proper interpretation of the Constitution, therefore SCOTUS exists. So long as there is a SCOTUS there needs to be equal representation. 9 people holding life-long seats are far too few for far too long. Special interest groups can take control too easily as has happened.

    • @hperrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Ok cool, so that way 500 thousand people will have the same say over our constitution as 40 million people, just because they live in the dirt state.

        • @CmdrShepard
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          They’re referring to different state populations in response to the above person stating that we should have one justice per state.