• Optional
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    NPR doing their thing.

    Tell us, NPR, if climate activists are having to fight conspiracy theories - presumably those theories came from somewhere? Are they autonomous? Sentient? No? Then why use them instead of saying big oil, fox news, Q social, the republiQan party, are what people working to save the planet have to fight with every day?

    Hm? Why bundle them all under “conspiracy theories”? Why not “people working on climate solutions facing a big obstacle: nouns”. Or “:scowly old people”?

    This is what NPR does. They’re ostensibly progressive, but their content is so mealy-mouthed and obscurant they only help republiQans feel better.

    Never got around to calling “enhanced interrogations” torture either. Reasons unknown.