Youtube let the other shoe drop in their end-stage enshittification this week. Last month, they required you to turn on Youtube History to view the feed of youtube videos recommendations. That seems reasonable, so I did it. But I delete my history every 1 week instead of every 3 months. So they don’t get much from my choices. It still did a pretty good job of showing me stuff I was interested in watching.
Then on Oct 1, they threw up a “You’re using an Ad Blocker” overlay on videos. I’d use my trusty Overlay Remover plugin to remove the annoying javascript graphic and watch what I wanted. I didn’t have to click the X to dismiss the obnoxious page.
Last week, they started placing a timer with the X so you had to wait 5 seconds for the X to appear so you could dismiss blocking graphic.
Today, there was a new graphic. It allowed you to view three videos before you had to turn off your Ad Blocker. I viewed a video 3 times just to see what happens.
Now all I see is this.
Google has out and out made it a violation of their ToS to have an ad blocker to view Youtube. Or you can pay them $$$.
I ban such sites from my systems by replacing their DNS name in my hosts file routed to 127.0.0.1 which means I can’t view the site. I have quite a few banned sites now.
I think you have to be watching a video that it connects to.
So for example I was watching the Game Grumps play Peppa pig (lol I know but it was hilarious) so it put an ad saying “try paramount plus to watch peppa pig” under it.
I’ve seen it on a few other vids that have movies associated, like sonic for example. Seems to be a semi recent thing though
(Is this how I post a pic on Lemmy? lol)
This is not the kind of ad most people are talking about though. This is like Amazon trying to get me to buy insurance whenever I purchase electronics (which I never do, of course).
EDIT: Just a point of clarification since people seem to be misinterpreting, i’m not placing fault here on OP. I’m saying it’s not surprising Google has sold a false bill of goods and is sneaking ads into their paid service. I’m not running cover for google, i’m just saying this is common among streaming services, and that we have no power as consumers
This is not at all surprising. Youtube Premium (as well as any other streaming subscription service) is well within their right to add whatever “ads” they want, even if you’re paying. Netflix has done this, so has Hulu and Amazon and GoogleTV. Even if you ‘buy’ media from them, they can remove access to it at any time.
You can’t count on Google’s (or anyone else’s) goodwill to not show you ads when you’ve paid to remove them. Google in particular has a terrible track record of terminating services the moment they determine it is no longer profitable.
I mean, in the image above it specifically says “You can go ad-free with YouTube premium.”
They don’t say “get rid of pre roll ads” or “remove banner ads” they just say “ad-free” which it specifically is not. They still show me an ad, so it’s not ad-free. That’s just a lie.
I def do not believe they are within their rights to add ads whenever they want, when I specifically bought “ad free”
I know I can’t trust google to stand by their word, I’m just saying that this is what finally broke the ol camels back and pushed me away from giving them anything, even my eyes on their “free” platform.
Yea, no I don’t think there’s any defense for their practices. If you read the ToS, i’m sure there’s language in there specifying the types of ads “removed” by the service, and that they can change the terms at will at any time for any reason.
That they are contractually protected doesn’t change the dishonesty and intentional deception of the practice. I just wish people would realize that all of these companies conduct themselves in this way, and as consumers we don’t have any real choice or control. Just because whatever company you’re buying a service from doesn’t abuse their position now, doesn’t mean they won’t in the future. The more market share a company has the more they can make these decisions without loosing much revenue, and if the decision nets them more profit even with fewer customers, why wouldn’t they make it?
deleted by creator
Yeah I only ever saw it on Desktop since I do most my viewing there, and even then only on specific videos. So its not crazy frequent, just annoying its a thing at all.
I do love the idea of youtube building in a skip for in vid sponsors though, that would possibly bring me back haha. Like if sponsored creators were required to add a “sponsor” chapter to their vids, so premium users could have it just skip that block of the video 🤔
deleted by creator