When you start talking like Mike Johnson about how people need to follow his religion and how our government needs to enforce his religious values, you’re too religious to be allowed in government.
Or using faith-based arguments to delineate if proper healthcare should be deemed illegal…
While implied by your statement, I feel the need to point it out seperately because even people who talk and act in a way that indicates they socially accept a diverse set of people, can have such strong ties to their religion that they can only see the moralistic argument in biblical terms (or at least terms fox news or their pastor keeps telling them), even if they don’t want to force everyone to go to church on sundays or stop practicing their own religion/non-religion
I’m pretty sure that was the point of the original comment.
Who decides what is too religious?
When you start talking like Mike Johnson about how people need to follow his religion and how our government needs to enforce his religious values, you’re too religious to be allowed in government.
Or using faith-based arguments to delineate if proper healthcare should be deemed illegal…
While implied by your statement, I feel the need to point it out seperately because even people who talk and act in a way that indicates they socially accept a diverse set of people, can have such strong ties to their religion that they can only see the moralistic argument in biblical terms (or at least terms fox news or their pastor keeps telling them), even if they don’t want to force everyone to go to church on sundays or stop practicing their own religion/non-religion
Me
I know a guy named Doug he’s, pretty smart