A murder of leading law professors have argued that the Fourteenth Amendment is self-executing and requires local election officials to remove Trump from the ballot, as though he were a “stable genius” who had not reached the age of 35. Taking their lead, citizens’ groups have commenced actions in at least 21 states to disqualify Donald Trump from running for President because he engaged in an insurrection.

Trump has prevailed in three of these cases, but it is only the first lap around the track…

  • spaceghotiOP
    link
    English
    151 year ago

    I don’t know, the Constitution is pretty clear that Trump is disqualified by the factual finding that he instigated and supported an insurrection. Any appellate court that strikes it down is going to reveal itself to be severely partisan.

    • AnotherAttorney
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      the Constitution is pretty clear that Trump is disqualified by the factual finding that he instigated and supported an insurrection

      The fact that every court to address this issue has said this is not the case suggests otherwise.

      • spaceghotiOP
        link
        English
        121 year ago

        It suggests that every judge ruling on it is afraid for their life if they uphold the Constitution.

        • AnotherAttorney
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          … or that there isn’t a legal basis for it because, y’know, that’s kinda the whole point of judges.

          • spaceghotiOP
            link
            English
            81 year ago

            So judges can’t make bad rulings, even for good reasons? Interesting.

            • AnotherAttorney
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              They most definitely can — it’s just not generally because they’re in fear of their lives lmfao.