dantheclamman to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoAfter 151 years, Popular Science will no longer offer a magazinewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1319 cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1319external-linkAfter 151 years, Popular Science will no longer offer a magazinewww.theverge.comdantheclamman to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square23fedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.online
minus-square@pdxfed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink59•1 year agoLet’s not talk about Discovery channel either, it went from a history/national geographic channel to 24/7 reality TV.
minus-square@rockSlayer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink48•1 year agoSame with the history channel. It’s almost like the unrelenting pursuit of profit destroys interesting niches in the name of widespread appeal
minus-square@RadicalCandour@startrek.websitelinkfedilink15•1 year agoAka your classic enshitification model.
minus-square@piecat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•edit-21 year agoHuh, that’s just enshitification with TV
Let’s not talk about Discovery channel either, it went from a history/national geographic channel to 24/7 reality TV.
Same with the history channel. It’s almost like the unrelenting pursuit of profit destroys interesting niches in the name of widespread appeal
Network decay, a common pattern.
Aka your classic enshitification model.
Huh, that’s just enshitification with TV
Seems like there’s a word for this……