dantheclamman to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoAfter 151 years, Popular Science will no longer offer a magazinewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1319 cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1319external-linkAfter 151 years, Popular Science will no longer offer a magazinewww.theverge.comdantheclamman to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square23fedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.online
minus-square@rockSlayer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink48•1 year agoSame with the history channel. It’s almost like the unrelenting pursuit of profit destroys interesting niches in the name of widespread appeal
minus-square@RadicalCandour@startrek.websitelinkfedilink15•1 year agoAka your classic enshitification model.
minus-square@piecat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•edit-21 year agoHuh, that’s just enshitification with TV
Same with the history channel. It’s almost like the unrelenting pursuit of profit destroys interesting niches in the name of widespread appeal
Network decay, a common pattern.
Aka your classic enshitification model.
Huh, that’s just enshitification with TV
Seems like there’s a word for this……