A mother and her 14-year-old daughter are advocating for better protections for victims after AI-generated nude images of the teen and other female classmates were circulated at a high school in New Jersey.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the country, officials are investigating an incident involving a teenage boy who allegedly used artificial intelligence to create and distribute similar images of other students – also teen girls - that attend a high school in suburban Seattle, Washington.

The disturbing cases have put a spotlight yet again on explicit AI-generated material that overwhelmingly harms women and children and is booming online at an unprecedented rate. According to an analysis by independent researcher Genevieve Oh that was shared with The Associated Press, more than 143,000 new deepfake videos were posted online this year, which surpasses every other year combined.

    • @Treczoks@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      187 months ago

      Isn’t it already? Has it provided any sort of protection? Many things in this world are illegal, and nobody cares.

        • @yamanii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          67 months ago

          I wonder why are you being downvoted, something being illegal puts fear in most people to not do it.

          • @31337@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            I’ve been wondering about this lately, but I’m not sure how much of an effect this has. There are millions of people in prison, and many of those will go on to offend again. Making things illegal can be seen as an agreement to a social contract (in a democracy), drive the activity underground (probably good thing in many cases), and prevent businesses (legal entities) from engaging in the activity; but I’m not sure how well it works on an individual level of deterrence. Like, if there were no laws, I can not really think of a law I would break that I wouldn’t already break regardless. I guess I’d just be more open about it.

            Though, people who cause harm to others should be removed from society, and ideally, quickly rehabilitated, and released back into society as a productive member.

    • @CAVOK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It is where I’m at. Draw Lisa Simpson nude and you get a visit from the law. Dunno what the punishment is though. A fine? Jail? Can’t say.

      Edit: Apparently I was wrong, it has to be a realistic drawing. See here: 2010/0064/COD doc.nr 10335/1/10 REV 1

      • @Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        87 months ago

        What about making depictions of other crimes? Should depictions of theft be illegal? Depictions of murder?

        Why should depictions of one crime be made illegal, but depictions of other heinous crimes remain legal?

        • @Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          97 months ago

          Because a picture of someone robbing my house doesn’t revictimize me. Even if it’s simulated, every time they run into some rando who recognizes them or every time a potential employer runs a background/social media check, it impacts the victim again

          • @Fal@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            117 months ago

            A picture of a cartoon child having sex doesn’t victimize you either, the same way a drawing of a robbery doesn’t victimize you

            • Ataraxia
              link
              fedilink
              47 months ago

              You mean being raped. What it does is let pedos feel like it’s OK to be pedos.

              • @Fal@yiffit.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                77 months ago

                Lol just like violent video games makes people think it’s ok to be violent in real life?