• @PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        I mean he could make a lot of things not work, but prefers to allow our fuck ups with random miracles mixed in. Apparently free will means letting us do bad shit.

        • And that’s where the whole tri-omni approach starts to eat its own tail.

          I have a whole shtick about free will not being compatible with either a materialistic nor a tri-omni worldview. I simply do not believe it exists, nor is it possible.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            211 months ago

            Epicurus tackled it centuries before Christianity existed:

            Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.

            Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.

            Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?

            Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?

      • @thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        711 months ago

        They think science is a religion. Manifestation of your will is what makes reality. So if they pray hard enough, it will have an effect. They think people who consider themselves scientists are just making it up and making it real because they believe it so much.

      • @PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        I don’t see why they would doubt that. In my experience they tend to trust medical science but god is a super doc that might miracle someone in a bad spot.