Rank-and-file members of both the House and Senate are paid $174,000 a year.

That probably seems like a decent amount of money, and it is: The median household income in 2022 was $74,580, according to the US Census.

But consider that members of Congress generally have to maintain two residences — one in Washington, DC, and one in their home state — and that they haven’t gotten a raise since 2009.

Inflation, meanwhile, has eaten away at the value of that salary over time: If lawmakers’ salaries had kept pace with inflation, they would be paid over $250,000 today.

Rep. Patrick McHenry, a North Carolina Republican who served as the interim speaker of the House following Kevin McCarthy’s ouster, told The Dispatch that congressional pay needed to be raised in order to attract “credible people to run for office.”

  • CrazyEddie041
    link
    fedilink
    6110 months ago

    If they’re struggling, then maybe they should pick up a second job, maybe cancel some of those subscription services?

      • Poggervania
        link
        fedilink
        1610 months ago

        Hell, maybe even pull themselves up by their bootstraps?

        In all seriousness, if you can’t live off a $175k salary in a country where the most expensive state requires you to make like $110k a year alone to live comfortably, that’s a you problem.

        • @fenynro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1010 months ago

          I have no love for our politicians, at all, but that’s somewhat misrepresentative of the situation.

          They’re not spending their money only in one state. They usually have to maintain multiple residences, one in their home state and another in the notoriously expensive DC metro area. DC cost of living eats a significant chunk of that value, I’m sure

          • Poggervania
            link
            fedilink
            310 months ago

            TIL something new - I did not realize they have to have homes in both their home state and in DC. Actually, I’m kind of surprised that’s how it worked, and it’s shitty if the government doesn’t provide them COLA or something if they have to have two homes.

            • @AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              810 months ago

              An additional benefit of the congressional dorm idea is to not get them too settled into a permanent situation - they know it’s temporary. Maybe it will help encourage more frequent turnover

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1010 months ago

      We should actually pay them more. We don’t want only the rich able to represent us.

      We should pay everyone more as well.

    • @jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      510 months ago

      I get the sentiment, but having members of Congress beholden to an employer would be pretty bad. There’s already a corruption issue with insider trading, speaking fees, the revolving door, etc.