He’s not alone: AOC and others have argued lawmakers should be paid more in order to protect against corruption and make the job more accessible.

  • lurch (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    1610 months ago

    You’re not wrong but it’s easy to mix up actual loyalty and being the highest bidder.

    • @ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      For many people it’s the exact same thing. And you absolutely cannot trust the public to vet candidates as has been proven over and over so only way to improve is to attract better candidates, and for that you need better pay.

        • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s because the Supreme Court decided “money is speech”, which is so fucking stupid and logically flawed that it makes my head want to cave in.

          “Speaking” is not subject to the rules of scarcity - given a supply of breathable air, water, and food, literally anyone could technically continue speaking indefinitely, both in a literal sense, as well as a written sense across various forms of transmission.

          Using money under the auspices of “speech” IS subject to the rules of scarcity, and is a direct reflection of socioeconomic gaps in our society - that is, Musk or Zuck or Bezos or insert billionaire here have multiple orders of magnitude more “monetary speech” than pretty much anyone in the country - or, for that matter, anyone in the history of the human race.