• @psvrh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes and no.

    Part of the issue for both is that posting stupid shit non-anonymously on social media does call your judgment into question, especially if you’re in a public-facing role and your behaviour be liability to your employer. Say Nazi stuff on Facebook and your employer fires you? Well, that’s a life lesson about consequences of your own behaviour.

    …and that’s also the case here, though OnlyFans allows a modicum of plausible deniability because it requires the viewer to actively and decisively source the content in question. The problem, for the content creator, is that the internet is leaky, and what happens on OnlyFans doesn’t stay on OnlyFans.

    This is separate from the compensation issue. For sure EAs are paid incredibly poorly, and while there’s liability issues, there are larger moral ones about slut-shaming someone trying to make rent through legal means.

    • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Part of the issue for both is that posting stupid shit non-anonymously on social media does call your judgment into question

      If you read the article, it wasn’t even under her real name. There’s literally no safer way to have a porn side-gig that I can think of.

    • @Gazing2863@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      It sounded like they also had content on platforms like TikTok that they had problems with. Like being dressed as a “schoolgirl” in tiktok videos.