• Martin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2035 months ago

    “While indiscriminate backdoors might be cheaper for the State than alternative investigative measures, they were expensive for society at large on account of the security risks they produced,” EISI told the ECHR.

    It’s great when someone with some sway actually gets it.

    • @hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      505 months ago

      EU institutions are pretty great, but sooner or later they’re going to lose the fight against the technofascist nightmare that’s constantly getting pushed on us

      • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        345 months ago

        Luckily this is not an EU institution, this is an international treaty above the EU. For example, Azerbaijan is a signatory.

        Point is, you can’t easily get it through EU legislation to overturn this, as it would need to cross the ECHR, which it won’t do.

        • @sunbeam60
          link
          English
          155 months ago

          Can’t wait to see the brexiteers’ faces when they realise Britain is still a signatory.

        • @hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          Ah duh, I guess I mixed up the ECJ and ECHR and the “EU court” in the headline didn’t help

        • @rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          For example, Azerbaijan is a signatory.

          And doesn’t really care, because there’s no punishment for, say, being a member of something with “human rights” in the name and Azerbaijan simultaneously.

          They even occasionally pay fines for torturing someone to death or things like that. Those fines are not that big.

      • JoJo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        185 months ago

        Stop this fucking doomerism and defeatism