The House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party sent a letter on Saturday to SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk demanding that U.S. troops stationed in Taiwan get access to SpaceX’s Starshield, a satellite communication network designed specifically for the military.

The letter, obtained by CNBC and first reported by Forbes, claimed that by not making Starshield available to U.S. military forces in Taiwan, SpaceX could violate its Pentagon contract, which requires “global access” to Starshield technology.

    • @Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      23
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      They’d have to seize spaceX too, which is the reason that starlink is viable in the first place due to reduced costs in launching satellites.

      And then if they do both, survive the brain drain while simultaneously surviving the onslaught of Republican attempts to defund it into oblivion, because that’s what they do.

      Yeah. I don’t like those chances, nor do I like Musk essentially having power over foreign relations. Kinda lose lose, which is why we’re in this shitty holding pattern atm.

    • @Illuminostro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You know what would be the cherry on top? Seize all of Musk’s assets, and kick his ass out of the country. Along with the Murdochs.

    • @Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      44 months ago

      Do you really want to give the government the power to do that, and then hand that power over to the military… I don’t like Musk but I see so many worse scenarios with this being controlled by the military.

        • @cole@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          This is crazy talk. Anybody can smuggle some terminals into their country. That doesn’t mean they’re being “helped”. The US government would come down on SpaceX with unprecedented force if they violated sanctions like that

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            It’s crazy talk? No. It’s reality. Elon shut down Starlink for the Ukraine military with the excuse that they would have started World War 3. Meaning he has the power to shut down Starlink for the Russians as well.

            • @cole@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 months ago

              I’d love to better understand your position. it seems like you think that Starlink is aware of who is using a terminal. how can Starlink differentiate between a Ukrainian and Russian user in the same general area? should Starlink randomly turn off user terminals it suspects? what if it accidentally turns off a Ukrainian one? billing is obv not a good indicator

              I want to understand your thoughts a little more clearly on this

                • @PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  Fair. I was referring to starlink access. They refused to turn them on in Crimea, but they didn’t disable it while Ukraine was on a mission as was initially reported.

      • TheChurn
        link
        fedilink
        74 months ago

        The government already has the power to do that.

        If shit ever hit the fan, they could just invoke the DPA and force starlink to do exactly what they say.

    • @cole@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      that seems pretty stupid, should we also seize Amazon Kuiper when they start launching very soon?

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        yeah if they contract for military access and then dumbassidly refuse to give it.

    • @PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      You can’t really put a real cost on seizing something like that. Not all of the costs will be up front or even obvious. People don’t like having their stit stolen, oddly enough.