• @teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        129 months ago

        I should re-read it, but the impression I got was that Oz was the epitome of this thread’s topic. A real “ends justify the means” villain, where his end goal is to save the world from itself by giving it a common enemy to vanquish. And he does it. In terms of the classical trolley problem, he pulled the lever to kill 1 instead of doing nothing and allowing 5 to die. Am I misremembering?

        • @zaphod@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          That’s roughly right, but that doesn’t make him in any meaningful way “good”. Of course I also don’t think anyone who decided to drop the bombs on Japan was a “good guy”. But maybe that’s why I’m not a pure utilitarian.

        • @emptyother@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          69 months ago

          Veidt asked the precognitive being if his plans for utopia would come to be, and if it was all worth it in the end. Osterman cryptically responded by saying “Nothing ever ends”, and teleported away leaving Veidt once again in doubt as to whether or not his plan was successful.

          From what I understood, he spent the whole story acting super-sure about what would happen if he did nothing, and how he alone could fix it. But in the end of the comic, this showed he had doubts. Veidt didnt have precognition, just very good prediction. But also an over-inflated ego. He killed a lot of people for a “maybe”.

      • @ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        In the movie the only one I would’ve considered good was Rorschach. He was the only one who only made personal sacrifices to save people.

        I mean dude legit let himself be killed because he couldn’t live with not telling the world what Ozymandius actually did.

        • @Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          89 months ago

          Rorschach being good is debatable, he’s a Batman like vigilante who hasn’t the ‘no killing’ rule, which is dubious.

          But the reason he chose death was (in my humble opinion) that he realized Veidt had found the solution, that would bring peace and create a world he would be useless in.

          This point is made by the ultra nationalist frontiersman publication he sent his diary to. They complain that they have nothing to write about as the world was united in boring peace, this is when the burger munching intern gets the assignment to pull something out of the loonie pile.

      • @mobius_slip@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        Veidt would never consider himself the good guy for what he did, but I think that’s what makes the writing so excellent.

    • @The_wild_card@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      239 months ago

      Nah ozymandies was kind of an ass regardless . Did he solve a big problem ? Yes . Was he a good guy ? Far from it.

      • QuestioningEspecialy
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        holy shit, you in for a treat
        there’s atleast an hour’s worth more of a movie in the comic
        also, the motion comic’s pretty freakin’ dope