The annual World Happiness Report has again ranked Finland and other Scandinavian countries the most cheerful nations on Earth. Costa Rica and Kuwait entered the top 20 in place of the United States and Germany.

Finland has remained the happiest country in the world for the seventh year a row with nordic neighbors SwedenDenmark and Iceland also retaining their places in the top 10, according to the annual World Happiness Report published on Wednesday.

But rising unhapiness especially among young people has seen other Western countries drop down the UN-sponsored index, with the United States and Germany dropping out of the top 20 for the first time since the report’s first edition more than a decade ago.

Taking their place were Costa Rica and Kuwait at 12 and 13 respectively, while Eastern European countries SerbiaBulgaria and Latvia reported the biggest increases in happiness.

Afghanistan, plagued by a humanitarian catastrophe since the Taliban regained control in 2020, remained in last place.

  • @Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    254 months ago

    I imagine that having something in recent history to compare yourself to has a significant impact. So, if there are people that have the USSR in their living memory, and then get to live free, they’ll have a little more perspective on how much worse things could be.

    Then an American with the 90s in living memory will recall what functional government that even had its budget in the green felt like.

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      244 months ago

      Finland was never part of the Soviet Union. The highest-ranked country that was is Lithuania at 19th, although 18th-ranked Czechia was on the Soviet side of the Iron Curtain

      • @Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 months ago

        Thank you for the correction. I was taking note of the highest increases being in former Warsaw Pact countries rather than the top 20.

        • Skua
          link
          fedilink
          64 months ago

          Ahh, sorry, misinterpretation of your comment on my part

      • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        94 months ago

        People have been talking about the loss of privacy for decades.

        This Peanuts character first appeared in 1963. He’s a little boy named ‘5’ whose father changed the family’s names to numbers after doing his income tax and being forced to provide tax payer ID, Social Security number, Zip Code, bank account number, and phone number.

        https://peanuts.fandom.com/wiki/555_95472

        • HACKthePRISONS
          link
          fedilink
          54 months ago

          that doesn’t make me feel any better about having governments and their constructs (corporations) looking over my shoulder.

          • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            44 months ago

            When did anyone have privacy?

            Back in the day, traveling shows would have someone hit the next town a week or so ahead of the rest. The peddler/tramp/salesman would spend a day or two casing the town and then report back. When the show arrived, people would go to the fortune teller and be amazed that someone who’d never been in town knew all their secrets. Many times, the spy didn’t even have to talk to people; they knew how to read who was doing well by what wash was on the clothesline or who had the nicest horse or had just painted their barn.

      • @Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        How much of the suffering was actually caused by someone physically giving you trouble, throwing you in jail or stopping you from doing something, and how much by emotions of fear that you have inside you?

        • HACKthePRISONS
          link
          fedilink
          74 months ago

          i know plenty of people who ended up in jail, but never me.

          are we really measuring trauma here? shouldn’t we be fighting oppression together?

          • @Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            I just think in the grand scale of things, a state doing limited surveillance is fairly low on the injustice ladder. I’m generally against it, but I think more of it is done by google and facebook than the FBI.

            I’m also not a believer that all oppression can/should be eliminated, as some will always be necessary for self-defense purposes. It’s not like countries invading other countries doesn’t happen, and we do need ways to fight back, which would necessitate some limited intelligence-gathering capabilities.

            That said, we do need to repeal the current surveillance laws, they went too far. It’s not limited strongly enough.

            • HACKthePRISONS
              link
              fedilink
              74 months ago

              >I’m also not a believer that all oppression can/should be eliminated

              … i’m an anarchist. so that’s like my raison d’être

              • @Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                14 months ago

                I think anarchists are important too. It’s our plurality of positions that makes us free. And stronger/more innovative in the idea space.

        • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 months ago

          I think the whole surveillance state thing is less about throwing individuals in jail, and more about controlling mass discourse.

          For example how social divisors like gender, age, sexuality and whatever else are amplified while criticism and action against the people cooking us alive is buried. You don’t need black chaikas and fear if you have soft power and constant outrage. TBH I think that’s why Trump got elected, a bunch of people went “fuck this shit” and either went and voted for Trump to “stick it to the man”, or just didn’t go to vote at all.

          How else is a state owned healthcare system deemed radical and hospitals being owned by private equity normal if it’s not those few profiting off the death and suffering setting what’s normal?

          • @Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            Yeah, but we’re going to have to regulate our massive companies to address that. Outrage is very profitable. Fear sells, just like sex.