As much as there is plenty of new people joining the threadiverse, the real wave starts today, with thousands of subreddits going dark.

Existing Lemmy/Kbin instances get hammered with new user registrations and deploy different coping strategies. Some plead, some close registrations. New instances spring up.

Soon, mainstream media will discover Lemmy exists. They will probably miss Kbin entirely, and most will also be very confused about the federated nature of Lemmy. Some might be able to remember Fediverse exists.

When Kbin finally shows up on their radar, they will find it difficult to explain how it fits into the narrative they already spun. My money is on someone calling it a “fork” of Lemmy. 🤣

Eventually, as more instances start turning off registrations, and as some buckle under the load temporarily, the narrative becomes “this is why Lemmy will fail.” Threadiverse will get treated like a VC-funded walled garden. Media will be flabberghasted at how “poorly” Lemmy and Kbin were able to “capture” the people wanting to migrate off of Reddit. They will complain endlessly about how hard it is to choose an instance, “confusing interface”, and ask “thoughtful” questions on “how will they monetize”.

Eventually, the wave subsides. Maybe Reddit reverses their silly ideas, maybe people get tired. There is a drop in active user accounts on the Threadiverse, compared to the peak of the wave, which is then taken as “proof positive” that Lemmy and Kbin could never “succeed”.

What they will ignore, of course, is that by then Threadiverse is several times bigger and more active than before all the Reddit insanity. Communities stay active, people stay active, and slowly Threadiverse grows, as (just like the broader Fediverse) it is not a VC-funded startup that needs a hokey-stick growth.

It’s a long-term project of making community-run platforms work. And that takes time, and effort, and love.

  • CrimeDad
    link
    English
    31 year ago

    Interesting, but don’t you think they’ll just wall it off like how truthsocial.com is walled off?

    • @rysiek@szmer.infoOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      A lot of fedi instances will block any Meta-owned instances on sight. Some will not. How it plays out long-term depends a lot on how well Meta instances get moderated.

      • @flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        That’s a really interesting point - they’re not to be trusted and they’ve already shown their hand, so to speak.

        I can’t see many connections for them…

        • @rysiek@szmer.infoOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Yup. But I do see it as potentially enabling people to migrate towards fedi, off of Meta instances, more smoothly than now. Some fedi instances will probably federate with Meta’s instances, so one could have an account on a non-Meta instance (thus having access also to fedi instances that block Meta), but stay in touch with contacts on Meta instances.

          That just might be enough to pull people towards greener pastures over here. 🙂
          I am pretty sure that people who already migrated to fedi will mostly not want to migrate back to Meta-owned instances. So it seems to me like it might be a one-way street. Which would be good!

          What I really worry about is two things:

          • Meta slurping data from fedi — but they can do that already even without running any instances, as far as public content is concerned;
          • additional, potentially insanely huge, load on the moderators of fedi instances that choose to federate with Meta instances.
    • Millions
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I think there’s a picture of it floating around on social media and you can see a mastodon account in there