JET's final nuclear fusion experiment produced a record-breaking 69 megajoules of heat. Nice.

Clean energy could be ‘closer than ever’ after a nuclear fusion machine smashed a record::JET’s final nuclear fusion experiment produced a record-breaking 69 megajoules of heat. Nice.

  • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    2·
    10 months ago

    may I ask why you’re so hostile?

    As for my point:

    Fusion is still a long way from being scalable and commercially viable, and every year we continue burning coal drives us closer to extinction. So we need to work with what we have now, and fast. When we get viable fusion in the future, great, we’ll have secured energy stability even more and maybe made it cheaper (that’s a maybe). But at the moment, we need to invest into renewables more. Orders of magnitude more.

    I’m just tired of click-baity articles like this. Fusion’s been 10-20 years away for more than half a century now, and while I don’t doubt that we’re making progress towards it, it won’t be ready in time to be the replacement for coal we are hoping for.

    • RubberElectrons@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      First point is not relevant, fusion has been chronically underfunded for far too long. The money being spent on fusion r&d is far less than the money going to renewables deployment, and you advocate cannabilizing even that???

      I won’t go down the list of how many technical contributions are coming out of fusion, just know that there are a lot, that help make both renewables and non-renewable more efficient. How do you switch tremendous amounts of current at extreme voltages, very quickly? The answer directly impacts overall efficiency of everything from EVs to micro & macro-grids. Usually it’s a pick-two-of-the-three, but switch systems are being used to solve these exact issues, successfully.

      As for why I’m hostile? Read the previous two paragraphs again, maybe something will jump out at you.