What I said is: you can be wrong with an allegation in the past, but it does not mean that you’ll be wrong with another allegation with no related subject in the future.
He may be wrong about Ukraine/Russia, but this subject is different from Gaza/Israel, which he is right and we have many evidences of the last one.
Brazil’s Lula says Zelenskiy ‘as responsible as Putin’ for Ukraine war
great guy
He’s not a paladin. He make mistakes.
But there are huge differences between Ukraine/Russia and Gaza/Israel.
Israel with Netanyahu is killing children and civilians.
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/10/damning-evidence-of-war-crimes-as-israeli-attacks-wipe-out-entire-families-in-gaza/
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67764664
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/02/israel-opt-new-evidence-of-unlawful-israeli-attacks-in-gaza-causing-mass-civilian-casualties-amid-real-risk-of-genocide/
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/2/9/israeli-snipers-kill-21-civilians-outside-gazas-besieged-nasser-hospital
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/09/civilian-toll-israeli-airstrikes-gaza-unprecedented-killing-study
And so on.
And so this makes it ok to “both sides” the war in Ukraine? This makes zero sense
I did not say that.
What I said is: you can be wrong with an allegation in the past, but it does not mean that you’ll be wrong with another allegation with no related subject in the future.
He may be wrong about Ukraine/Russia, but this subject is different from Gaza/Israel, which he is right and we have many evidences of the last one.
You’re trying to steamroll the user’s valid point which is that this person is a shitty source of info.
What? Are you on drugs?
it’s not a valid point. it’s the very definition of poisoning the well.
Tankies be wilding fr fr
He’s a big headline guy. Say enough imflamitory stuff and you’ll get in the news.
@Billy doesn’t make him wrong about Climate Change, the Amazon rainforest, or the genocide in Gaza though.