• bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    it’s not a great approach in most cases

    Any cases.

    Do you think a death penalty for netanyahu unfair, in fact not giving a death penalty is unfair to all the children and women and everyone else he has killed

    Fair? What does fair mean? Does an execution un-kill the victims? What a ridiculous notion that any sort of punishment for a perpetrator could be “fair” for the victims.

    The death penalty is an abject failure. It has no benefits and numerous issues. Practicing barbarism can never be justice.

      • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        it definitely will make other people think twice before they do the same thing

        There is absolutely no evidence to support that assertion.

        There is no proof that the death penalty deters criminals. According to the National Academy of Sciences, “Research on the deterrent effect of capital punishment is uninformative about whether capital punishment increases, decreases, or has no effect on homicide rates.”

        US Department of Justice

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            I believe that most developed countries have gotten rid of the death penalty, and a big part of that is because it doesn’t work as a deterrent.

            Very few people decide whether or not to commit a crime based on the punishment. Most criminals think they won’t get caught at all, or if they do, they think they’ll get away with it in court.

            • FatCrab
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              This slightly misses the mark. The majority of crimes, including violent ones, are not committed by people performing a risk calculus. They’re done with minimal thought and more often than not in the heat of the moment. Effectively, they are not crimes that you can deter because for a crime to be deterred, the potential criminal has to assess whether it makes sense to commit the crime. This works in cases of like financial fraud and white collar crime. Someone shooting another person during an altercation, not so much.

              • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Thanks here for this comment, I feel like I see where my stance might not make sense, ofc death penalty should not be given in cases like this where emotion takes over, I am rather taking about ppl like trump and gates and Netanyahu who are completely sane, they just kill for their own benefit

                Ppl here have assumed that just because I said ‘I see reason’ means I feel like you need to kill everyone who commits this, No, I am saying that I don’t know the exact circumstance, it might or might not be justified, I hope we can clear this up moving forward

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yeah there’s a way to deter crimes and it’s increasing the certainty of punishment. Overly severe punishment actually has an unwanted effect of increasing the severity of crimes. If a rapist is going to die if caught that incentivizes murdering the victim who is inherently a witness.

                  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    No, they convince themselves it isn’t rape. Rape is a lot less dark alley and a lot more sober person and person too drunk to say no or pressuring or some other means of soft power. Look at studies which showed that if you don’t say the word rape a lot of admit they’re willing to do it.

                    So what you get from executing rapists is someone who raped their partner either in an emotional frenzy or a coercive stage gets accused or has a flash of realization and promptly gets violent lest they die.

                    Also, as a woman I’m a lot less likely to accuse someone of rape they actually did to me if I know it could lead to them hanging in the public square. Suddenly the weight of their life feels like it’s on my hands and I don’t want them dead.

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                And what level of certainty do you need? Keep in mind uncertainty means innocents are murdered by the state and 100% certainty is difficult enough that it will generally put you into the anti capital punishment camp.

                Also it sounds like you have a failure of understanding how the rich get out of punishment. Yes sometimes it’s like Brock Turner where it’s blatant. But other times it’s because they can afford the means to hide evidence and sow doubts. And when all else fails they’re more likely to have ins with judges or the ability to flee preemptively.

          • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            we don’t even need evidence to know

            No matter what follows this…yes, we do. You should need evidence to believe anything; understanding of course that the more extraordinary the claim, the more extraordinary the evidence needed.

            giving them merely some jailtime is not working either, but whatever

            Then imprison them for life. Guess what, life imprisonment is cheaper than the death penalty, and can be overturned if there’s an error.

              • FatCrab
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yes, we should also be addressing the failings of our penal system(s). Unfortunately, many around the world, and clearly yourself included, are more interested in retributive “justice” than habilitative functions.

      • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        That is the same thinking that those who own hand guns think. They think they will be safer, yet all the stats indicate other wise including all the children accidentally firing a gun and killing a family member. If risk of death was a deterrent, the USA would be among the safest place in the world.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Do you really have a degree in criminology? What kind of lawyer are you exactly?

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I used the search functionality, they have a degree in criminology, history, and law. I don’t know how common that combo is, neither do I want to cast doubt on this person’s comments… but it doesn’t help that the majority of them defy logic at every turn.

              Just yesterday, @JustZ@lemmy.world told me they know more than South Africa about apartheid, and thus Israel cannot be an undemocratic apartheid state. They also told me that when America didn’t allow women and black people to vote, it was “still a democracy”. But they also said that an apartheid rule is when a minority has control over a majority (this is the only definition they offered)… that would mean, by @JustZ@lemmy.world’s own definition, that America before suffrage for women and black people was an apartheid state.

              • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                I deleted my comment due to some drama, but I remember also having pretty long conversations with this guy, who thinks that just because hamas exists, Israel is free to genocide

                • ???@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  No worries, I understand.

                  Same here… for me it’s that the pretends to respect Palestinian life then says something that amounts to excusing genocide and 75 years of Israeli opression all in the same sentence.

              • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Youre a moron and have no idea what you’re talking about. Please stop tagging me. I don’t care what you have to say any longer.

                You post irrelevant links constantly, you lie about what they say, you lie about what you think I said, and it’s exhausting to try and correct you. I’m not your dad or your teacher so kindly fuck off and leave me alone. Do you understand?