• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    182
    ·
    9 months ago

    The centrists has their basic needs met and isn’t part of a social group that is threatened so they see both as a waste of tax spending.

    • geoff@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      9 months ago

      Implied by this: centrists see all this mainly as a financial matter.

      • hglman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        9 months ago

        Centrists are unwilling to accept change or inconvenience. This differs from conservatives who think things should go back to some sort of old way.

        • Flumpkin@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s really impossible to know what you mean here, because conservative should mean to keep doing what works: They should be social democrats (what worked to build the US e.g. Nixon lol). So we shouldn’t use that word any more. True conservatism would be more left wing than democrats today.

          The GOP has become a reactionary or “paleo-conservative” which is really a misnomer too. What they really are now is a theocratic fascist party. But really they have no values at all except power and hate and inequality.

          There are no real centrists, there is no center here. They are really corporatists who are willing to play politics in order to please the big capitalists or plutocracy. They love trump because they can keep cutting of left wing politics and not have a platform. In foreign policy they are fascist as well (american exceptionalism, a belief in inequality based on identity).

        • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          We gotta stop callin them conservatives. These shits are trying to roll things back, not keep it as-is. They’re the opposite of progressive: they’re regressive.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          That would be reactioners, not conservatives. You guys also have problem of reactioners taking name of conservatives.

          • hglman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            American Centrist are reactionaries, American conservatives are not reactionaries. That is my point.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re right, of course, but a key trait of sociopaths is viewing people through the lens of what they can do for them.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I wanted to say how I have my basic needs met, isn’t part of social group that is threatened and don’t see left as waste of tax spending, but then I remembered about good Uncle Voencom that happily sends to die for Putin’s yacth, so I don’t count as not part of social group that is threatened.

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Balance is required to see things clearly. Just because both sides suck equally in their own ‘special’ way doesn’t change the fact they are their own worst enemy.