spoiler

Salaries for new roles are stagnating – and in some cases, falling. Some employers may be looking to cut costs, but the lack of wage growth may be a matter of post-pandemic correction.

The mass US layoffs of the past few years are continuing. In 2024 alone, thousands of workers across many sectors, including media and technology, have lost their jobs and are on the hunt for new ones. But some are finding an unwelcome surprise as they scan listings for open roles. A salary bump is all but impossible; in many cases, wages seem lower than their previous pay – even for the same jobs.

They aren’t imagining things. A 2023 report on pay trends from ZipRecruiter showed 48% of 2,000 US companies surveyed lowered pay for certain roles.

But, say experts, companies aren’t necessarily just seizing a moment in a tight job market to reduce costs. In some cases, stagnant and even lowered salaries are the result of an overdue reset for a pandemic era surge in compensation when companies were scrambling to fill roles during the Great Resignation. The effect of oversupply

The tightening labour market has left US workers with fewer options than just years earlier. Beginning 2020, employers boosted salaries to new heights to attract talent to a deluge of open roles. But amid an uncertain economy, employers have pulled back from new hires and cut jobs.

“There is now less competition to hire workers – and therefore less need to boost wages,” says Nick Bunker, US-based director of North American Economic Research at Indeed. “Job postings have dropped quite a bit, while the supply of workers has grown.”

At its peak in early 2022, US wage growth for advertised roles climbed to 9.3% year-over-year, according to Indeed data. It has fallen precipitously ever since, as demand for workers has slumped. By January 2024, it had plummeted to 3.6%. The downward trend continues, and it’s unclear when it will reach the bottom.

Now, with a decline in open roles, workers have fewer opportunities to get new jobs and secure better compensation. Simply, employees have less leverage to negotiate pay or secure a better starting salary – especially if they’re clawing for any type of employment they can get.

In some cases, says Bunker, a company may not outright drop their compensation for new roles, but in the current environment of inflation, money simply won’t go as far – the same wage as before may feel like a pay cut to workers. But in other cases, a greater supply of workers against weakened demand may mean a similar position from 2022 is now advertised with a lower salary.

This is most likely to happen in industries that had the greatest competition for workers during the hiring crisis. For example, Indeed data shows US hospitality and retail jobs experienced 11.8% wage growth year-over-year in February 2022 – falling nearly four-fold 3.4% by January 2024. Companies in other sectors, such as tech, which once experienced a high demand for workers, are now also resetting expectations.

“We saw a massive bull run in the market during the pandemic, where there was a big increase in baseline compensation for workers because of talent shortages,” says Chris Rice, of Boston-based US executive tech recruiting firm Riviera Partners. “We’re still seeing a market reset that’s ongoing. An oversupply means compensation has dropped because the demand is no longer there.” ‘A whiplash effect’

Ultimately, employers who are filling roles after layoffs or hiring freezes are likely to use the newfound leverage they have, says Till von Wachter, professor of economics at University of California, Los Angeles. “They’ll tend to orient their new salaries at the going rate, so starting wages may fall in order to equilibrate the market,” he says.

The current phenomenon may be felt most acutely in the US because of how its economy rebounded from the first Covid-19 lockdown in 2020. Indeed data shows its peak wage growth dwarfed that of the UK and Europe. “The US economy jumped out the gates in the wake of stimulus packages and mass vaccinations,” says Bunker. “So, wage growth has faded rapidly amid less job market churn and switching.”

In many ways, what we’re seeing is a correction. Wage growth is reverting to pre-pandemic levels of below 3%, says Bunker. “A 9.3% spike in year-over-year wage growth is anomalous in many ways. It came from the initial shock of Covid-19, and an economy heading towards recession suddenly rapidly expanding, then having to suddenly hit the brakes again. It’s a whiplash effect.”

At current rates, wage growth may return to pre-Covid levels by May 2024, says Bunker. Whether it rises, plateaus or shrinks from there depends on whether hiring picks up. And if inflation continues to rise, workers will increasingly feel the pinch of these new lower or stagnant salaries, he adds.

While inflation has begun to drop in the US and UK, the cost of living has outstripped salary increases for nearly three years, says Bunker. “Real wages today are still below where they would have been presumed to be, pre-pandemic. So, it’s a race between inflation and wages.”

        • novibe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          9 months ago

          In a systemic way, that’s literally how things are right now lol

          Most people are in some type of debt and have negative net worth. Like most people literally need to spend more than they earn to survive. And the money comes from working at a capitalist company, and spent at capitalist companies.

          The whole world is a giant corporate town (except for the good places ofc).

          • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            9 months ago

            The whole world is a giant corporate town (except for the good places ofc).

            They’re arguably the worst. The folks that live in those places just have an exceptionally long line of credit, so they can keep the ball rolling indefinitely.

          • Des [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            love giving 30% of my paycheck back to my job because im too tired to shop anywhere else (plus i can get some first come first serve discounts)

            oh wait now its 35%. 40%. and all the food packages are half empty wtf

            • TechnoUnionTypeBeat [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              I know chips are the classic and kinda misunderstood example but fuck, I grabbed a bag of chips - not even a name brand, just a store brand - and the fucking thing cost me six bucks (CAD) and barely felt a quarter full

              • Des [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                9 months ago

                from where i work you can tell when they do the shrinkflation thing because an item that typically sells well will go onto “closeout” or be “discontinued” and then brought back a week or so later but with like a few fractions of an ounce (or a few dozen grams) removed.

                maybe the package imagery or logo changed a bit to distract people

                i’ve noticed chips and sodas doing this the most frequently followed by dry cereal and dairy products

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 months ago

      smuglord: “Bro, bro BRO! You gotta stop working for the man to make money, bro! You were supposed to invest bro! Just buy a starter house and rent it out, bro! Poverty is a mindset, bro! You can become rich just by deluding yourself into thinking you are, bro! You can also just start your own business bro, MANIFEST that shit, bro!”

  • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    9 months ago

    Funny how when wages go down its a post-pandemic correction (even though the pandemic isn’t over) but when prices stay high its just that the market moves in mysterious ways.

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      Perfect radicalization tool. If you’re poor, you will see an increase in suffering as a result of the economy being good, so “the economy” is irrelevant at best for poor people or our outright enemy.

  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yes but see you just don’t understand the economy. Let me explain how nobody being able to afford housing or food or transportation or healthcare is actually a good thing.

    • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Well, it is a good thing really, if the ultimate goal is going back to slavery. We shouldn’t assume worsening economy will lead to some leftist revolution it will just as likely lead to some combination of fascism and 19th century capitalism conditions. If anything the liberals will march right along saying the 2048 election is the most important election of our times because they realy want to bring back slavery so you must vote…

      • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        9 months ago

        Honestly, I just don’t think (or maybe want to doubt) it will get to that. Call me unmaterialist, but I have this hairs-on-the-back-of-my-neck inkling that people in the US are waay closer to another breaking point than we let on. Anecdotally, I went to a Gaza protest last week and out of thousands of people there, I saw no libs and zero vote shit. Everyone was a communist, the speakers and organizers were communists, there were communist flags, it’s communist time babybig-cool

        • Tunnelvision [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yeah in general if I see someone complaining about shit and they’re not a clear leftist I just don’t listen. You’re not serious about fixing shit at that point. I’m not disrespectful obviously because I don’t want to be rude, but I’m not taking what you say to heart either.

    • DinosaurThussy [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      It is exactly like that. Companies continue to corporatize and consolidate. HR becomes more and more the domain of consultants (read: 🐍). And as wage setting consultancy is itself centralized into a small number of companies, the ability to collude and fix labor market prices becomes a reality. Real Byzantine ancap shit.

  • Sephitard9001 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    9 months ago

    Everything under capitalism will continue to increase in price, except for wages, because wages increasing would cause inflation.

    So you’re saying capitalism is designed to exploit the working class?

    No that’s a communist conspiracy theory.

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      grillman: “Stupid lefties, they think everything they dislike should be banned but everything they do like is a human right that should be paid for by others!”

      Also grillman: “Having a business is a human right, and that’s why we need workers to work for free!”

  • Kusuriya@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    9 months ago

    Boy are they going to be surprised when their profits start “resetting” because nobody can afford their shit

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Capitalists really do perform a great job in showing us why a command economy is more efficient. Because of “muh shareholder value” we’re in what is essentially a man-made famine.

      porky-scared-flipped stalin-gun-1 stalin-gun-2

    • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is this even going to happen though? Companies that run into trouble just get bailed out by the federal government, which can print dollars endlessly due to imperialism.

  • carpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 months ago

    A person I know was one of the overpaid tech workers until he quit his job mid last year, expecting to take a few months off and then jump back in elsewhere for +20% pay. There’s a bit of schadenfreude watching him seek work now and not just getting things on a silver platter.

    • solarvector@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 months ago

      Was he underpaid, or are you just under paid?

      Schadenfreude seems misplaced when it’s just that one segment of the workforce escaped getting fucked over, and now they’ve joined the majority in getting fucked over.

      • carpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        9 months ago

        He’s a reactionary treat baby and a landlord. I hear you and you’re right on a systemic level. Nevertheless, I never claimed to be a perfect communist and I hope many many other people get better treatment before this guy does.

  • abc [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 months ago

    I got a 9.5% raise this year (which honestly pissed me off because if you’re gonna give someone a 9.5% raise just go for fucking 10%) but lol with inflation it is meaningless. supervisor was like “yayyyyy :)” when they told me only to be shocked when I went what-the-hell “cool this brings down my rent budget from 80% of my monthly income to ~75%”

    • TheDeed [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Idk what to say whenever I get a raise. I’m aware that they’re expecting you to say “thanks” or something like that but it feels too much like ass kissing.

      Especially when I can plainly see that I’ve gotten poorer despite the raise due to inflation.

      I usually just do an “oh, good”. Feels weird to effusively thank them when it’s always less than what I deserve and we both know it, it’s hard to hold it in.

  • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    Imagine being a normal person, sitting and writing this drivel uncritically, seeing what you have made and not minecrafting yourself immediately.

    "It’s not fair that material conditions made it clear we could pay far better than we were willing to before the pandemic forced our hand. Mods plz i-spil-my-jice "

  • GrumpigPoopBalls [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 months ago

    my savings are like 1/3 of what they were this time last year after a 6 month involuntary "fun"employment gap and medical bills and it barely feels like I can start building anything up again. I got told last week that i’m probably not eligible for a raise this year because i haven’t been with the company long enough (because they laid me off for 6 months before i went back for a different position…) i was explicitly rehired over other potential candidates because they would have to pay me less since I don’t have a phd agony-4horsemen