• Hemi03@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 年前

    There is a fine line between stable and outdated. Some debian pakages are like 2 years out of date. I just cant handle that on a desktop.

    • Shareni@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 年前

      Flatpak, nix, guix, snap, appimage, distrobox, etc. You most certainly can handle that.

      On my system half of the packages come from Debian repositories, and half from nix unstable.

    • zaphod@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      So don’t run stable on a desktop? If you want a bleeding edge rolling release, that’s what sid is for.

      • Hemi03@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 年前

        Dont you think there is a healthy line between booth? I would not whant anyone using old ass versions with old ass bugs. Its also bad for new users, who expect software to be remotly up to date.

        • zaphod@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 年前

          For the target users of Debian stable? No.

          Debian stable is for servers or other applications where security and predictability are paramount. For that application I absolutely do not want a lot package churn. Quite the opposite.

          Meanwhile Sid provides a rolling release experience that in practice is every bit as stable as any other rolling release distro.

          And if I have something running stable and I really need to pull in the latest of something, I can always mix and match.

          What makes Debian unique is that it offers a spectrum of options for different use cases and then lets me choose.

          If you don’t want that, fine, don’t use Debian. But for a lot of us, we choose Debian because of how it’s managed, not in spite of it.