Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said policy differences toward Israel between her and President Biden won’t stop her from supporting him in the November general election.

“Of course,” Omar said Tuesday, when asked by CNN’s Abby Phillip on “NewsNight” whether she would vote for Biden if the election were held that day, in a clip highlighted by Mediaite. “Democracy is on the line, we are facing down fascism.”

“And I personally know what my life felt like having Trump as the president of this country, and I know what it felt like for my constituents, and for people around this country and around the world,” Omar continued. “We have to do everything that we can to make sure that does not happen to our country again.”

  • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t understand why people don’t realize that trump is also a Netanyahu ally. They’re old pals.

    It’s not like trump winning over Biden would change anything about the US policy on Israel- except probably make it worse, and trump winning over Biden would definitely make things in the US and pretty much everywhere else US policy affects worse.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      9 months ago

      Everyone realizes it, but that doesn’t mean people want to endorse Biden’s stance on Gaza. He still needs to earn people’s vote if he wants them to go out to the polls and vote for him.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, not everyone realizes that. You wouldn’t believe how many posts I’ve seen railing against “genocide” go on to claim that Trump would be tougher on Netanyahu. Saw one a couple days ago that even claimed that because Putin is such an ally of Iran and therefore Hamas that he’d be better for the people of Gaza. Which is just a mind fuck I can’t even understand being able to type.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          9 months ago

          For those who still don’t understand;

          https://www.axios.com/2024/03/14/us-settler-sanctions-west-bank

          The U.S. Department of Treasury announced new sanctions Thursday against two illegal outposts in the occupied West Bank that were used as a base for attacks by extremist Israeli settlers against Palestinian civilians, three U.S. officials told Axios.

          Why it matters: It is the first time U.S. sanctions are being imposed against entire outposts and not just against individuals.

          The move comes as the Biden administration ratchets up pressure on the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over a range of issues, including settler violence against Palestinians and the war in Gaza. There were nearly 500 Israeli settler attacks against Palestinians between Oct. 7 and Jan. 31 of this year, according to the UN humanitarian office (OCHA).

          https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-israel-gaza-finish-problem-rcna141905

          PALM BEACH, Fla. — Former President Donald Trump declared Tuesday that Israel must “finish the problem” in its war against Hamas, his most definitive position on the conflict since the terror group killed 1,200 Israelis and took more than 200 hostages on Oct. 7.

          That month, his campaign also said that, if elected again, he would bar Gaza residents from entering the U.S. as part of an expanded travel ban.

          • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I would argue that progress like this is only happening because of the pressure on Biden from people saying they won’t vote for him if he continues to support the genocide. The biggest change was after the uncommitted movement in some of the primaries That’s why I’m okay with people saying they won’t vote for him, as long as they agree to vote for him if he continues to improve.

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          > You wouldn’t believe how many posts I’ve seen railing against “genocide” go on to claim that Trump would be tougher on Netanyahu. Saw one a couple days ago that even claimed that because Putin is such an ally of Iran and therefore Hamas that he’d be better for the people of Gaza.

          you’re right: i don’t believe this. can you link it?

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is like suggesting the firefighter has to earn your trust before you let them carry you out of the burning building.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      As always, you can come right out and say you’re supporting Biden and say that Trump is worse, and you can count on someone to ignore it and lecture anyway.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      “I will never vote for (Palestinian) genocide! But I will definitely refuse to vote against (Ukranian) genocide!”

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        9 months ago

        Either they’re wedge-driving russo/right-wing bots, or they’re grandstanding only to shoot themselves in the foot on an issue they claim to care about.

        Any rational person understands more people will suffer in both Gaza and Ukraine under Republican leadership. Period. That’s it. End of story. It’s election season, time to fall in line to save Democracy… Again.

        • Crikeste@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          Doesn’t sound like much of a democracy if I don’t really have a choice, now does it?

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            9 months ago

            Huh? Did anyone stop you or anyone else from running for President?

            I’m not a fan of FPTP and think massive campaign finance and election reform needs to take place, but the choice presented right now is unfortunately a reflection of the broader electorate, and for better or worse that’s democracy.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah actually. We’ve made money political speech and routinely refused to use public campaign financing. That pretty effectively bars 99.9% of people from ever running for president. And 98% from running for any office above local school board.

              • lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I wholeheartedly agree with money equating to speech being disastrous as to the healthy function of a democracy, but the complaint here doesn’t strike me as that. While we all know the game is skewed toward money, we should also know the better choice between these candidate couldn’t be more obvious.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  That’s not what you asked. Restricting the pool of candidates to elites (money or connections) absolutely has an effect too. If it seems like our politicians are out of touch, that’s why.

                  • lennybird@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Ok. If you’re going to play that game, then the obvious answer to what I asked:

                    Did anyone stop you or anyone else from running for President?

                    … Is No, nobody stopped them from running. Money may help, but is not prerequisite to running. People also get money if they garner support. Hence the success of grassroot organization.

            • Zink@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah you get to make the choice, but don’t get to influence what the options are.

              Well, you can have some influence via primaries, either voting, donating, or campaigning. But once the nominations are in place it’s just a multiple choice question.

        • I see what looks like a lot of virtue signaling. They have to let everyone know how extremely against genocide they are so that their social media peers recognize how decent they are. Stops them from seeing any of the many bigger pictures involved.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I had one (my first block here) that was trying to say that it was unknown whether Biden could be trusted to leave office after his second term voluntarily and that they were both dyed in the wool fascists but of course he(/she/they/it) defended only Trump throughout the thread.

      • juicy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        In two years, 587 children have died in Ukraine. In 5 months, 12,300 children have died in Gaza. These are not comparable. Israel’s conduct is far and away worse than Russia’s in terms of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

    • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      We don’t understand why Biden doesn’t stop supporting Israel.

      Its like supporting Bibi would lose Biden votes, but not supporting him wont. Yet he still goes out of his way to support them.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You could understand if you wanted to. It’s the majority view held by the intelligence and foreign services of most western powers and virtually everyone in Washington. It’s not like they are hiding the explanation.

        Try to see the bigger picture and what this proxy war means for the world. If thirty thousand deaths make you too sad to vote for Biden and that results in reelecting Trump, how sad will you be when Iran shoots its shot against Israel and we’re here on Lemmy talking about thirty million deaths and a cascade of failed states throughout the Middle East and eastern Europe fueled by the unprecedented humanitarian crisis and masses of refugees?

        What does it mean for the world and for human rights everywhere if the western powers allow the only democracy in the middle east to fall to actual, for-real, far right religious extremists, who will actually, for-real genocide every Jew in the middle east in favor of an Islamic religio-ethno dictatorship?

        How does ceding Israel to actual fascists advance the interest of lasting peace or human rights, especially if it ends up reelecting Trump, who will never leave office if he gets in again?

        Maybe instead of throwing away democracy in America and the middle east, we can maybe appreciate that 30,000,000 is more than 30,000?

        Maybe it makes more sense if we use America’s persuasive power to see Netanyahu and his party defeated at the ballot box? Wouldn’t that be much better for the world?

        Biden isn’t the roadblock to peace in Gaza. He didn’t cause the situation or prolong it in any way. Israel has all the weaponry and fighters it needs to turn Gaza and the West Bank into a sheet of glass in about ninety minutes if it wanted. Even with conventional weapons, they could carpet bomb the entirety of Palestine many times over before the loss of US support disrupted Israeli’s defensive posture as to Gaza.

        It is Israel’s posture as to Iran that dictates America’s course, and frankly it’s not that hard of a choice given the stakes. Continued support is continued leverage, whereas ending support ends any leverage America may have over what Israel deeply considers to be, more or less, a local police matter.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Excusing Palestinian deaths by saying 30,000 had to die so that 30 million in the future don’t get killed in some fantasy scenario that has not happened and is unlikely to happen.

          This is what you are doing here.

          Emotionally protecting yourself from 13 thousand dead children.

          (Btw kids, please don’t vote for Trump, but also don’t allow bs like this to cheapen Palestinian blood)

        • juicy@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          lol. Israel is not a democracy. 5 million Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza are non-citizens without a vote. The PA is entirely under the thumb of Israel, and Palestinians in the West Bank live in apartheid. Gaza has been besieged and abused for 20 years. Your precious “Only Democracy in the Middle East” is a last bastion of proud European colonialism. The one colony that is still establishing new settlements and clearing “savages” from new land. America long ago divested itself of the Phillipines, but we pour money and weapons into our client colonial state between the river and the sea.

            • juicy@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              When a third of your population aren’t citizens, and in fact most of their families have lived there since the Ottoman Empire, while your citizens have mostly immigrated from abroad in the mid-1900s, and have pushed the non-citizens who predated them into ghettos, you can call it whatever you want. But it’s repugnant.

              • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                That’s great, let’s agree that all of that is true; nothing will erase the original sin will it?

                The starting point to peace is right now. How we got here does not have to dictate where we go from here.

                What is it that you’re advocating with the land records line of reasoning, that the Israel government is evicted, that democracy in the middle east ends, and gets replaced with an Islamist caliphate, because the Jews did not inhabit the Levant during the Ottoman empire? Hmm, where were they again?1 But moreso, who were the inhabitants at the beginning of recorded history? I mean if you want to go back to the records and do a title search, go back to the first record. Why would you stop less than halfway?


                1. https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/faq/dhimmi (“A dhimmi refers to a non-Muslim subject of the Ottoman Empire. Derived from Islamic legal conceptions of membership to society, non-Muslims ‘dhimmis’ were afforded protection by the state and did not serve in the military, in return for specific taxes. The dhimmi status was legally abolished in 1839 with the Hatt-ı Şerif of Gülhane and was formalized with the 1869 Ottoman Law of Nationality as part of wider Tanzimat Reforms. Regardless of these official changes, in various places within the Empire non-Muslim subjects faced various forms of institutional discrimination.”). https://web.archive.org/web/20181214221418/http://jewishhistory.research.wesleyan.edu/i-jewish-population/5-ottoman-empire/ (“As the dhimmi, Jews and Christians were subject to: A special tax (the jizya); A prohibition against carrying arms; A prohibition against riding horses; A prohibition against building new houses of worship or repairing old ones; Prohibitions against public processions and worship; A prohibition against proselytism; A requirement to wear distinctive clothing; A prohibition against building homes higher than Muslim ones.”).
                • juicy@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Nothing will erase the original sin, but Israel can abide by international law and allow the Palestinians to return to their homes and give them equal rights. We are not talking about ancient history. The Naqba was just 75 years ago.

        • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          9 months ago

          And Jewish people are a monolith and all support Israel? Ironically this is closer to actual antisemitism than someone who hates Israel as a state because of their horrendous actions.

            • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              9 months ago

              Again, as a monolith? Like “they” all hold this position? Hopefully you see the issue here. Many jewish people absolutely do not support Israel at all

                • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  This article discusses the issue. We have to assume that this recent bout of war crimes has made less jewish people supportive of Israel as well.

                  As the article says, they are not a monolith

                  • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Now I bet if we compare the numbers to, let’s say Muslim population, the numbers against Israel will be far lower.

                    What I am saying is that for Jewish people, the probability of supporting Israel is higher compared to non-Jewish ones.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Jews are not Israel. Israel is not Jews. Stop being a Zionist freak. No one cares what the makeup of the US is. Jews aren’t supposed to support genocide, so if anything, there being many Jews in the US should mean Netty’s behavior should be even less agreeable.

          • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Well, Israel is a Jewish state whether you like it or not and it was created for that very purpose.

            Just like it is common for Muslims to support other Muslim states, Jewish people tend to support Israel.

          • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Jews “aren’t supposed” to support or oppose anything as a monolith. That’s just racial essentialism.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Pretty sure plenty of Jews preach against genocide… Or are you saying Jews are OK with genocide as a religion?

              Either way … very dumb.

              • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I’m not collecting all Jewry and describing what they do or do not believe, for one! I’m saying that being Jewish isn’t only about participating in a religion. And I’m also saying, which underlines my previous points, not all Jews think the same or believe the same thing.

                Are you Jewish? Are you Palestinian?

                To disagree with the basic point that all people, regardless of classification, don’t believe one single thing is ridiculous. To what are you even trying to retort?

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          If I understand correctly, you’re noting that the Jewish people in America lean supportive of Israel and because they comprise a larger population pool than the vehemently strong pro-Palestinians, Biden must then carefully toe the line between the two groups to court the largest % of votes to ensure the far-worse guy doesn’t get in power?

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            “ironically” it’s actually Christian far right nationalist evangelicals (a bunch of self contradicting terms if you ask me) who support Israel most in USA, not Jews living in USA (who often left or refused to move there for a reason!).

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        https://www.axios.com/2024/03/14/us-settler-sanctions-west-bank

        The U.S. Department of Treasury announced new sanctions Thursday against two illegal outposts in the occupied West Bank that were used as a base for attacks by extremist Israeli settlers against Palestinian civilians, three U.S. officials told Axios.

        Why it matters: It is the first time U.S. sanctions are being imposed against entire outposts and not just against individuals.

        The move comes as the Biden administration ratchets up pressure on the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over a range of issues, including settler violence against Palestinians and the war in Gaza. There were nearly 500 Israeli settler attacks against Palestinians between Oct. 7 and Jan. 31 of this year, according to the UN humanitarian office (OCHA).

        If they fully drop all support for Israel then multiple countries are likely to start war against Israel, possibly Iran and 2-3 others. That will cause the entire region to destabilize

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m not good at detecting sarcasm in text; less so when there’s no text.

        I see a performative monkey. Was that the intent?

        • yarr@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Different viewers take different meanings from that picture. However, I would guess that someone who is extremely anti-Israel would never be captured in a photo like that. From what I know, the above is a genuine image and it is not contested that Trump visited the wall in this manner.

          • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            However, I would guess that someone who is extremely anti-Israel would never be captured in a photo like that.

            It’s trump. He has no real position on anything except what he thinks might make him look good. I’d bet everything I have that he doesn’t even understand the situation enough to have a cohesive position, and just figured wearing a little hat and putting his hand on the wall like other people do would play well with a group he wants to like him.

            He’s like a child. He’s said so himself. This photo is a publicity shot, nothing more.

            • yarr@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              This photo is a publicity shot, nothing more.

              Yet, I doubt we would find the leaders of HAMAS taking a similar photo. His participation in this ritual means SOMETHING.

              • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                It means he visited during peacetime and his handlers thought this would get him more Jewish support, which he was sorely lacking due to his very public antisemitic comments in the past.

                It was very transparent. There’s no deeper meaning here than that.

                e: and it worked in some circles, apparently, since some people are still posting this photo to argue he’s not an obvious antisemite.

                • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Remember when Trump waved the pride flag. Republicans have gone full no holds barred with Trump. They want every person to be able to look to him and find something to latch onto.

                  It works. Except, anyone cursed with the slightest bit of reason can ask, “how can Trump respect people of color but align himself with white supremacists?”

                  After that novel breakthrough you have to rationalize trumps ties to the GOP and despite their outward tolerant behavior (sarcasm) they have quite the voting record showing their willingness to hurt marginalized people.

                  Here are some others:

                  “How can Trump be chosen by god but is a poster child for each of the seven deadly sins?”

                  “How come the world most successful real estate agent billionaire needs my 50 bucks to pay his legal fees?”

                  “How can Trump be pro LGBTQ+ but align himself with people who would strip LGBTQ+ people of their rights?”

                  • yarr@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    “To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself – that was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word ‘doublethink’ involved the use of doublethink.”

                    ― George Orwell, 1984