James Cameron on AI: “I warned you guys in 1984 and you didn’t listen”::undefined

  • stooovie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes I can. example

    Opposed to other technology, nobody knows the internal structure. Input A does not necessarily produce output B.

    Whether you like it or not is irrelevant.

    • drekly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Whether you like it or not is irrelevant.”

      That’s a very hostile take.

      I just think it’s wild they wouldn’t know how it works when they’re the ones who created it. How do you program something that you don’t understand?! It’s crazy.

      • stooovie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is, sorry. It was a Reaction to the downvotes. But at this point I’m a bit allergic to the “it’s the same as every other invention” argument. It’s not, precisely for this reason. It’s a bit like “climate is always changing” - yes, but not within decades or centuries. These details are crucial.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Basically with neural networks you program the way it injests data and how it outputs data. Everything else in between is constantly updating statistical algorithms. Developers can look at those algorithms, but it’s extremely hard to map that back out into human readable content.