Somewhat overdue IMHO.

  • no banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yes. They’re suing them, alleging that they’re breaking the law. Or, as I said “suing them for breaking the law”.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Ok, it seems you’ve finally arrived at what’s happening.

      That was quite the journey for you!

      • no banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Looks more like you’ve misunderstood my comment, but ok. It’s not too important. We seem to agree.

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          All did was state fact and correct your erroneous statements. If you need to project your miscomprehensions onto me to make yourself feel better, go ahead. My self-esteem can take it.

          Have a nice day!

          • no banana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            No animosity from me. I do think that the allegation was implicit in my comment however. It is, in my opinion, obvious that when you file a lawsuit you are claiming that the law itself has been broken. Clarifying with allegedly seems superfluous.

            You as well!

            • gregorum@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              If there was no animosity, you would’ve dropped it instead of trying to start an argument.

              Fortunately, I have more self-control and I’m just gonna block you.

              Try some ice cream. Perhaps that will cool you off.