• Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sadly we love hierarchy dominance just about as much as we hate how much it makes us look like apes.

      Teachers and school administrators almost always side with bullies. They can’t help themselves.

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      While I agree that we should avoid bullying rather than just avoiding bullying specific groups, this might go too far. We should just make a whitelist of people who you can bully, like Republicans or people who watch reality television.

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        No. It may feel good in the moment, but doesn’t change anything. It just reinforces their belief that the world is out to get them and makes us hypocrites, or if done regularly enough, turns is into the beast we would destroy as e also feel bad about our behavior and ignore those feelings long enough (they’re there for a reason). And sure, there will be momentary lapses and negative feelings we didn’t know what to do with them. That’s when it’s time to face our shadows, again, and do the work. It took me a half a century to get there, but I’ve begun trying. I hope you will join me. It’s an individual work, but we can support each other, if you’re game.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        If we’re going here…

        Whitelist isn’t the preferred nomenclature. Use terms like allow-list or permit-list.

          • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Usually a deny-list or a block-list.

            These are the inclusive terms that are getting adopted in IT, at least, and they usually work in that context. Maybe not for everything.

              • quaternaut@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                At my company, white hat hackers are to be called “offensive security researchers”. Black hat hackers are to be called “attackers”.

              • DEADBEEF@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Don’t forget about the whole master/slave thing or how often programmers kill children.

              • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                I think grey still is acceptable, at least until the martians start demanding equal rights.

                I think terms like “legal grey area” don’t have the same connotations as black/white do, because “grey” isn’t really used as an adjective for a person.

                I still refer to our oldschool Linux admins as greybeards. I think that’s okay because there’s like 5 oldschool female Linux admins in the world and they are chill as hell.