Clbull@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoBlizzard locks you out of account if you don't agree to new terms; no ownership, forced arbitrationyoutu.beexternal-linkmessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up1912
arrow-up1912external-linkBlizzard locks you out of account if you don't agree to new terms; no ownership, forced arbitrationyoutu.beClbull@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-squareIrateAnteater@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·9 months agoWhich shouldn’t be allowed in relation to consumer goods and services.
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 months agoMeh, arbitration is cheaper and faster than actual litigation. I see clear advantages for both parties.
minus-squareBezier@suppo.filinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·edit-29 months agoBut also obvious disadvantages to the customer in cases like this. Why should the customer not have a right to refuse?
Which shouldn’t be allowed in relation to consumer goods and services.
Meh, arbitration is cheaper and faster than actual litigation. I see clear advantages for both parties.
But also obvious disadvantages to the customer in cases like this. Why should the customer not have a right to refuse?