• Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, I think you’re probably right, in this case. But you’re just quoting the reporting on the poll, which is very misleading. It makes it sound like there is no statistical model involved at all. From the methodology on the linked full poll results: “The full sample is weighted for region, age, education, gender and race based on US Census information”. Like I said, I think you’re right - I doubt if they mean weighting for “region” to imply they did an electoral college analysis - but until you look at the actual poll and it’s methodology, you can’t just assume that an article reporting on the poll is giving an accurate impression. There are polls that do account for state breakdown, and the reporting in an article on such a poll would probably be just the same as here.

    It seems the focus of this poll was to get some initial idea what kind of impact a third-party run with Manchin and some Republican running mate would have, and looking at weighted national numbers is probably “good enough” for that purpose, at this time. Definitely not a basis to conclude Biden has it in the bag, and the poll itself doesn’t seem to be trying to claim that.

    Sorry I’m going on, but yeah, big picture, you are correct, at least in this case.

    • Jordan Lund
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, there’s no doubt a statistical model to represent the entire country. The problem with popularity contest polling like this is the election isn’t a popularity contest.

      Now, a similar survey running down each contested state and calling out the electoral college votes, that would be useful.

      Anything that leads with “a national poll…” can be safely disregarded.