This is quite concerning

  • kae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    8 months ago

    This a huge step back for transparency with Meta (shocker). Access to this data is important for a variety of reasons, and using the recent EU laws as an excuse is deplorable (again, shocker from Meta).

    It’s clear the data companies were left alone for too long to rule the schoolyard. It’s going to take some time to treat them and others what decorum looks like without throwing an absolute hissy fit.

    Here’s hoping the EU, which seems to be the only teacher on the playground willing to discipline anyone, will set them straight.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Walmart can’t do shit without the cops.

          And do you realize how much they’re subsidized by the state? When has the state ever stopped Walmart from doing anything?

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            8 months ago

            I thought we were starting over. What makes you think there won’t be cops?

            A badly MSPainted, AI Generated police officer in Walmart with Walmart logos on his cap and badge, and holding an AR-15 assault rifle

            It’s cute how people think scrapping the constitution and starting over will somehow make things better.

            • Asafum@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              8 months ago

              Imagine thinking the owning class wouldn’t be the ones creating the new constitution…

              Something needs to change, but once we open that can of worms were going to see things like:

              “All citizens are required to give all personal data to meta whether using the platform or otherwise.”

              “Oil will be enshrined as the National Energy Source™”

              “Union activity is an act of economic terrorism.”

            • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Why do you think there will still be wal-mart?

              And why do you think the constitution binds anyone who matters? You’re treating it like a fucking magic spell.

              • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                They are among the top five richest corporations in the world and the leading employer in the world, last I checked. You going to dissolve that power? No? They have money and power, they will make the rules. You have to either find a way to dissolve them (good luck with that!), or you have to have another big power structure to keep them in check. That’s how it works.

                • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  This power structure is based on faith and agreement. Its more fragile and fractious than you think.

                  And what the fuck are you smoking if you think the government is opposed to corps? Can I have some?

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        How do you prevent it from turning into a “might makes right” system ?

              • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                Looked it up, it relates to the behavior after a natural disaster. I think that’s quite a specific situation that gives everyone a common goal to work on for a relatively short period. I also think it suddenly interrupts a situation where there was a government, so people are still acting as citizens. Outside of such event, I am not sure people would work together as much. I can think of many examples where the weakening or absence of government leaves room for religious extremist organization (Irak under ISIS) or criminal organizations (Haiti currently) which are pretty much “might is right”.

                  • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Sorry I didn’t know you would think I had to spend a couple of days reading a book in order to be able to discuss your point.

              • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Point of mutual aid is bringing up and inclusion while getting necessary shit done, and yeah it does some smoothing on top, but other mechanisms can be helpful.